an open letter to governor arnold schwartzenegger and the higher-ups at sf muni (our beloved transportation system):
i just wanted to take this moment to state unequivicably how much i love the new reduced changes in service.
i love waiting longer for trains. really, i do. it is my belief that we san franciscans do not spend enough time outside in the near-perfect weather, and with the increased waiting time for trains, it's a breath of fresh air for my lungs - literally and metaphorically. plus, the extra ten to fifteen minutes i spend waiting can be easily used for soul-searching and for finding cures to the world's problems. clearly, a lot can be done while waiting longer for the train. and the now-standard wait of 20-25 minutes allows us not to take muni for granted, much like how we did when we only had to wait 5-10 minutes.
and when the train eventually does show up, i must admit that i do love standing as close as humanly possible to the person next to me in the now trademarked "as-crowded-as-possible" setting. i love being able to hear their whistling song of inhaling and exhaling and to smell their aromas - especially after a hard-day's work, or when they're on their way to a commune in the park. i can't help but feel that it brings me closer to mankind as a whole, to experience these different senses, and this would never have been possible had there been more trains to carry these passengers and therefore a place for me to sit. besides, by standing, i burn calories. my doctor will be thrilled to hear that!
so you can clearly see how much i love the new reduced service - but increased benefits. more time outside, more time to think, getting closer to my brethren and burning calories while standing - who says muni isn't concerned for my general welfare?
and to anyone who complains about reducing in service while raising the prices, i say don't listen to them. they're only silly people who have somewhere to go.
sincerely,
your biggest fan ever.
Monday, October 31, 2005
Sunday, October 30, 2005
how to offer a perfect tribute
to wellington mara, from his beloved team:
shutout the hated redskins. give up just seven first downs. allow only 125 total yards. cause ten turnovers.
score 36 points. pile up 386 yards of total offense. control the ball for 39:21.
and for a personal tribute by those who loved him most:
a gritty ten yard touchdown catch. run for a career-best 206 yards with a touchdown. and continually pressure the quarterback all day long, and eventually getting a sack out of it.
bravo, big blue.
shutout the hated redskins. give up just seven first downs. allow only 125 total yards. cause ten turnovers.
score 36 points. pile up 386 yards of total offense. control the ball for 39:21.
and for a personal tribute by those who loved him most:
a gritty ten yard touchdown catch. run for a career-best 206 yards with a touchdown. and continually pressure the quarterback all day long, and eventually getting a sack out of it.
bravo, big blue.
how to make me laugh
whenever i hear something i think is funny on the telly, i'm gonna post it under a heading that says "how to make me laugh". that's the way i'm gonna roll for now on. you best believin'.
and now, for our first installment:
"66% of americans recently polled believe that president bush is doing a poor job on the war in iraq. the other 34% believe adam and eve rode to church on dinosaurs."
- tina fey, "saturday night live"
and now, for our first installment:
"66% of americans recently polled believe that president bush is doing a poor job on the war in iraq. the other 34% believe adam and eve rode to church on dinosaurs."
- tina fey, "saturday night live"
Saturday, October 29, 2005
how you can't deny the accusation
oil companies have reported a record-breaking spike in profits at a time when prices are at a record-breaking high - insanely high - especially after hurricane katrina and the war in iraq.
so, i ask, is this capitalism or is it just capitalizing?
so, i ask, is this capitalism or is it just capitalizing?
how little class and tact there is
cbs just announced that a miniseries called "category 7: the end of the world" will be premiering on november 6.
are they friggin kidding?
i just counted. it's only been 69 days from when katrina hit new orleans.
i think it might be a touch too early to capitalize on it and to make money on it. then again, i might not be the best person to comment on this, considering that i have both a heart and a soul.
now, i know it's not exactly about katrina (but i'm sure michael bay's team is working on that script right now) and i know that they started filming before the tragedy, but that doesn't give them any reason to actually air it - especially just 69 days after something so devastating in this country. i would say that it comes across as tasteless, but we're talking about television networks, so that word wouldn't really bother them.
look, i'm not claiming that i know exactly how long it should be. i just don't believe now is the right time. it reeks of capitalizing.
you do know this conversation was discussed by cbs executives.
- "well, to bring up the 'category 7' discussion, well, you do know it's only been 69 days since..."
- "yes, but i've done some research, and 65 days has been decided to be the optimal length of recovery time for viewers. we are waiting 69 days. that's four more days of healing."
- "i see, yes, and 65 days, where did that number come from?'
- "we had a focus group in utah and that's what they came up with. 65 days. it's our corporate standard. utahans don't lie. they loved 'everybody loves raymond'."
- "didn't everybody love 'everbody loves raymond'?"
- "the utahans did first. therefore, the corporate standard. 65 days. 65."
- "i see, yes, cbs' corporate standard, yes."
- "we are doing four more than the corporate standard. we go the extra mile."
- "i see, yes, but why not wait an extra couple of weeks, you know, to be just that sure."
- "i don't want to disrupt any CSI programming. now that would be a tragedy."
corporate laughter follows.
- "what about hurricane wilma?"
- "i didn't hear you."
- "i said, what about hurr..."
- "i said, i didn't hear you."
more corporate laughter.
are they friggin kidding?
i just counted. it's only been 69 days from when katrina hit new orleans.
i think it might be a touch too early to capitalize on it and to make money on it. then again, i might not be the best person to comment on this, considering that i have both a heart and a soul.
now, i know it's not exactly about katrina (but i'm sure michael bay's team is working on that script right now) and i know that they started filming before the tragedy, but that doesn't give them any reason to actually air it - especially just 69 days after something so devastating in this country. i would say that it comes across as tasteless, but we're talking about television networks, so that word wouldn't really bother them.
look, i'm not claiming that i know exactly how long it should be. i just don't believe now is the right time. it reeks of capitalizing.
you do know this conversation was discussed by cbs executives.
- "well, to bring up the 'category 7' discussion, well, you do know it's only been 69 days since..."
- "yes, but i've done some research, and 65 days has been decided to be the optimal length of recovery time for viewers. we are waiting 69 days. that's four more days of healing."
- "i see, yes, and 65 days, where did that number come from?'
- "we had a focus group in utah and that's what they came up with. 65 days. it's our corporate standard. utahans don't lie. they loved 'everybody loves raymond'."
- "didn't everybody love 'everbody loves raymond'?"
- "the utahans did first. therefore, the corporate standard. 65 days. 65."
- "i see, yes, cbs' corporate standard, yes."
- "we are doing four more than the corporate standard. we go the extra mile."
- "i see, yes, but why not wait an extra couple of weeks, you know, to be just that sure."
- "i don't want to disrupt any CSI programming. now that would be a tragedy."
corporate laughter follows.
- "what about hurricane wilma?"
- "i didn't hear you."
- "i said, what about hurr..."
- "i said, i didn't hear you."
more corporate laughter.
Friday, October 28, 2005
how to simply put it
i like bill maher. i might not agree with him all the time, but he's incredibly well read and research, and everything he says has a foundation of thinking behind it - which really puts him into rare air in the world of talking heads - and that makes him well worth watching.
anyways, he had a show last week about the upcoming indictments of scooter libby, karl rove, dick cheney and eventually george w. bush, and how the republicans are calling this a "witch hunt", even though they did the same thing to bill clinton during his impeachment process. it's all hypocritical. all these politicians are completely blind to america.
the medium-sized explanation of the whole thing is that these indictments (and eventual impeachment charges) declare that the bush administration revealed the identity of a CIA agent whose husband, a writer for the new york times, was about to reveal that the claims of wmd's in iraq were fabricated to justify a war. so the administration put his wife in peril in a proactive response to the truth about an unnecessary war, which has since claimed 2000 american lives.
clinton, on the flip side, got a blowjob - and he also had monica lewinsky in the room while holding high-level security talks, which was a stupid thing to do.
to put it simply, however, maher said that bush, cheney, rove and libby are going to be impeached for leaking the name of a cia agent. clinton was impeached for leaking on a fat jewish girls' dress.
funny.
anyways, he had a show last week about the upcoming indictments of scooter libby, karl rove, dick cheney and eventually george w. bush, and how the republicans are calling this a "witch hunt", even though they did the same thing to bill clinton during his impeachment process. it's all hypocritical. all these politicians are completely blind to america.
the medium-sized explanation of the whole thing is that these indictments (and eventual impeachment charges) declare that the bush administration revealed the identity of a CIA agent whose husband, a writer for the new york times, was about to reveal that the claims of wmd's in iraq were fabricated to justify a war. so the administration put his wife in peril in a proactive response to the truth about an unnecessary war, which has since claimed 2000 american lives.
clinton, on the flip side, got a blowjob - and he also had monica lewinsky in the room while holding high-level security talks, which was a stupid thing to do.
to put it simply, however, maher said that bush, cheney, rove and libby are going to be impeached for leaking the name of a cia agent. clinton was impeached for leaking on a fat jewish girls' dress.
funny.
how to honor a legend
in the haste of being attacked by the grobanites, i failed to write anything about the death of wellington mara, the owner of my beloved new york giants and one of the main reasons why the NFL is what it is today.
obviously, i didn't know the man. but every giants fan knew him, truly knew him, as our surrogate grandfather, our surrogate father, our surrogate brother. he loomed over the meadowlands every sunday, and just seeing the overwhelming emotions of tiki barber, jeremy shockey and michael strahan, all 60 years his junior, all saddened by the news of his passing, speaks volumes.
anyways, i read this article, written by someone who knew him, and it got to me a little.
then i read this compilation of quotes from influential football players, coaches and executives about him, and nothing tells the true measure of a man than this, from lawrence taylor: "mr. mara was the greatest thing that ever happened to the new york giants. personally, he always treated me fairly. he was always there to help me, even when i wasn’t willing to help myself."
god bless, mr. mara. go big blue.
obviously, i didn't know the man. but every giants fan knew him, truly knew him, as our surrogate grandfather, our surrogate father, our surrogate brother. he loomed over the meadowlands every sunday, and just seeing the overwhelming emotions of tiki barber, jeremy shockey and michael strahan, all 60 years his junior, all saddened by the news of his passing, speaks volumes.
anyways, i read this article, written by someone who knew him, and it got to me a little.
then i read this compilation of quotes from influential football players, coaches and executives about him, and nothing tells the true measure of a man than this, from lawrence taylor: "mr. mara was the greatest thing that ever happened to the new york giants. personally, he always treated me fairly. he was always there to help me, even when i wasn’t willing to help myself."
god bless, mr. mara. go big blue.
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
how to become a michigan football fan
have your cousin sign a national letter-of-intent to play for them.
congrats, john.
from the staten island advance or newsday.
go maize and blue.
congrats, john.
from the staten island advance or newsday.
go maize and blue.
how not to shock the masses
a wnba player recently admitted that she's gay.
also in the news: alcoholics admit they like alcohol.
also in the news: alcoholics admit they like alcohol.
Monday, October 24, 2005
how grobanites need a serious dose of reality
first off, i would like to thank each and every grobanite who took the time to read my blog and then comment on it (read post below). i respect all of your opinions, and respecting my opinion means i should respect yours.
having said that, you are all out of your minds.
i never said that josh groban had a bad voice. reread my post. in fact, he's got a fantastic voice. he's a great vocalist. but instead of singing the song, he decided instead to show off his voice. and whenever a vocalist makes that decision, it results in them crapping the bed.
the best version of the star-spangled banner that i ever heard was whitney houston's version, right before super bowl xxv in 1991, mainly because she sang that song exactly how it was meant to be sang. you see, that's the beauty of it. it's arranged in a certain way for words to be accentuated, for emotions to be felt and, most importantly, for the whole song to be sold as genuine. and by singing it the way it was meant to be sung, she blew everyone away.
which is ironic, because she has made a career of showing off her voice rather than singing a song.
you see, there are vocalists and there are singers. you might not think there's a difference, but there is. the best way to explain it is with the song "i will always love you", sung by both dolly parton (who wrote it) and, again, by whitney houston.
when you hear dolly's version, you hear the desperation and the loneliness and the hurt of the words. the lyrics dictate how dolly sang it. there's genuine pain in the words and thoughts and in how dolly used her voice to sell that. granted, she wrote the song, but the template was made for future singers. she sang the shit out of it. you completely feel every nuance.
whitney's version, however, is completely devoid of pain or any sort of emotions. her voice does give you goosebumps, i agree, but that's not the point: she used the lyrics to show off her voice to the extreme where the emphasis of the song was completely lost. but that's okay for whitney; the song wasn't what she wanted to show off anyways. you see, using the musical arrangement of that song behind her, she could have read the words to the declaration of independence or the back of a cereal box and her vocalization wouldn't have changed. the lyrics were incidental. she used the song to vocalize. she used the song to show-off. the song was irrelevant.
huge difference between the two versions. listen to them both and tell me that i'm wrong. you can't.
and that's exactly what i felt about josh groban's performance, or anyone's performance when they change the singing of the star spangled banner for the mere purpose of showing off their voice. it cheapens the song, and it's never ever better.
and, most importantly, it always ends up with the vocalist crapping the bed in front of an entire nation and with a crowd full of people rolling their eyes and saying "what is this asshole doing?" but that's okay. they've all got loyal fans who will continue to buy their brand of vocalizations. and that's their right. more power to them.
kudos to all you out there for supporting him. that's admirable.
but a bed has been crapped upon.
he crapped the bed.
america's bed.
now with his crap on it.
so that's my point: a singer is able to adapt their voice to the song. a vocalist just does their thing, no matter what is warranted. he vocalized the song, and an injustice was done to it. and that's a shame.
if you think that he sang the best performance of that version of the national anthem, then go for it. i agree with you, and i would rather not hear that version ever again.
but let's be real here: it's safe to say that you also believe that if josh groban pitched for the astros, he would have pitched a no-hitter. or that if josh groban did the play-by-play, he would have predicted everything right before it happened.
so everything i've read has been taken with a mountain of salt.
i'm sure that i've now pissed you all off more. so be it. can't say i've been trembling much. then again, i've also now probably pissed off the "friends of whitney houston" group. that actually scares me more. she's craaaazy.
so, to recap and to respond to your thoughtful comments:
- yes, i would have done a better job at singing the national anthem, mostly because i would have sung the national anthem. and this is coming from someone with a horrible voice.
- i have a huge appreciation in music, mostly because it's part of my job to work with music and work with composers in coming up with original songs or adaptions of old songs. yeah, i know what i'm talking about. and i understand why some things should be left alone. i understand updating things to make them better. but there has to be a reason for it, other than showing off.
- he crapped the bed.
- you all obviously like the way that smells.
having said that, you are all out of your minds.
i never said that josh groban had a bad voice. reread my post. in fact, he's got a fantastic voice. he's a great vocalist. but instead of singing the song, he decided instead to show off his voice. and whenever a vocalist makes that decision, it results in them crapping the bed.
the best version of the star-spangled banner that i ever heard was whitney houston's version, right before super bowl xxv in 1991, mainly because she sang that song exactly how it was meant to be sang. you see, that's the beauty of it. it's arranged in a certain way for words to be accentuated, for emotions to be felt and, most importantly, for the whole song to be sold as genuine. and by singing it the way it was meant to be sung, she blew everyone away.
which is ironic, because she has made a career of showing off her voice rather than singing a song.
you see, there are vocalists and there are singers. you might not think there's a difference, but there is. the best way to explain it is with the song "i will always love you", sung by both dolly parton (who wrote it) and, again, by whitney houston.
when you hear dolly's version, you hear the desperation and the loneliness and the hurt of the words. the lyrics dictate how dolly sang it. there's genuine pain in the words and thoughts and in how dolly used her voice to sell that. granted, she wrote the song, but the template was made for future singers. she sang the shit out of it. you completely feel every nuance.
whitney's version, however, is completely devoid of pain or any sort of emotions. her voice does give you goosebumps, i agree, but that's not the point: she used the lyrics to show off her voice to the extreme where the emphasis of the song was completely lost. but that's okay for whitney; the song wasn't what she wanted to show off anyways. you see, using the musical arrangement of that song behind her, she could have read the words to the declaration of independence or the back of a cereal box and her vocalization wouldn't have changed. the lyrics were incidental. she used the song to vocalize. she used the song to show-off. the song was irrelevant.
huge difference between the two versions. listen to them both and tell me that i'm wrong. you can't.
and that's exactly what i felt about josh groban's performance, or anyone's performance when they change the singing of the star spangled banner for the mere purpose of showing off their voice. it cheapens the song, and it's never ever better.
and, most importantly, it always ends up with the vocalist crapping the bed in front of an entire nation and with a crowd full of people rolling their eyes and saying "what is this asshole doing?" but that's okay. they've all got loyal fans who will continue to buy their brand of vocalizations. and that's their right. more power to them.
kudos to all you out there for supporting him. that's admirable.
but a bed has been crapped upon.
he crapped the bed.
america's bed.
now with his crap on it.
so that's my point: a singer is able to adapt their voice to the song. a vocalist just does their thing, no matter what is warranted. he vocalized the song, and an injustice was done to it. and that's a shame.
if you think that he sang the best performance of that version of the national anthem, then go for it. i agree with you, and i would rather not hear that version ever again.
but let's be real here: it's safe to say that you also believe that if josh groban pitched for the astros, he would have pitched a no-hitter. or that if josh groban did the play-by-play, he would have predicted everything right before it happened.
so everything i've read has been taken with a mountain of salt.
i'm sure that i've now pissed you all off more. so be it. can't say i've been trembling much. then again, i've also now probably pissed off the "friends of whitney houston" group. that actually scares me more. she's craaaazy.
so, to recap and to respond to your thoughtful comments:
- yes, i would have done a better job at singing the national anthem, mostly because i would have sung the national anthem. and this is coming from someone with a horrible voice.
- i have a huge appreciation in music, mostly because it's part of my job to work with music and work with composers in coming up with original songs or adaptions of old songs. yeah, i know what i'm talking about. and i understand why some things should be left alone. i understand updating things to make them better. but there has to be a reason for it, other than showing off.
- he crapped the bed.
- you all obviously like the way that smells.
Saturday, October 22, 2005
how josh groban should be flogged and/or destroyed
i believe fully in flogging and/or destroying any performer who believes that their talent allows them to change the singing of the national anthem. although this country is built on free speech, and the right to sing a song however you choose, i feel that it's completely disrespectful to crap on "the star spangled banner" with some "special version" of it, and, let's be honest, it's never a change for the better. in fact, it's purely making changes just for changes sake. the song was written and composed that way for a reason. so sing it like that.
i feel that we need to sacrifice a performer to get my point across.
and with josh groban butchering "the star spangled banner" before game 1 of the world series by changing its tempo and inflections, i see that we have our first scapegoat.
thank you, josh. you will not be missed.
i feel that we need to sacrifice a performer to get my point across.
and with josh groban butchering "the star spangled banner" before game 1 of the world series by changing its tempo and inflections, i see that we have our first scapegoat.
thank you, josh. you will not be missed.
how you should never trust the drunkards
it has come to my attention that an inebriated male assumed my identity and sent out e-mails to some of you, and also posted on my blog early saturday morning, around 3:30 am.
had i been aware of this unprovoked attack on good writing and spelling, i would have taken every means possible to have prevented it. but this writer was incapacitated.
i assure you that measures will be taken to keep this from happening again.
i am ashamed for all of us.
had i been aware of this unprovoked attack on good writing and spelling, i would have taken every means possible to have prevented it. but this writer was incapacitated.
i assure you that measures will be taken to keep this from happening again.
i am ashamed for all of us.
how to type a drunk e0mail
this is me after my friend billy's going-away party ashemoves to australia..
i am drunk and with the hivccups.
i can barely stand much less type.
i refuse to edit check.
i had a good time tonight,
good times were had,
imwrote "billy, don;t put the blow in bloke" on the poster. if ound that funny.
wha t is wrong with nme?
i am drunk and with the hivccups.
i can barely stand much less type.
i refuse to edit check.
i had a good time tonight,
good times were had,
imwrote "billy, don;t put the blow in bloke" on the poster. if ound that funny.
wha t is wrong with nme?
Friday, October 21, 2005
how to make those three hours tolerable
random thoughts from jury selection, which lasts every day from 1:30 to 4:30:
1. if someone really wants to be excused from a jury, they will go to all ends to do it. they will say anything. they will admit to anything. and i'm not talking about the bullshit racist comments. there've been none of those. i'm talking ridiculous statements and rationalizations.
2. busy female lawyers don't dress well. in fact, i hold their outfits in contempt.
3. when the judge needs to call some more prospective jurors from the jury pool, everyone in the audience makes themselves as small as possible - even though their names are pulled from a random list. for reference, their reaction is the exact opposite than the audience from "the price is right".
4. stupid people put themselves into stupid situations where stupid things happen to them. it's amazing to see how bad things happen to people when they do nothing to stop them from happening - or are always open for them. san francisco is "jerry springer" but the trailers are victorians. by the way, i'm just talking about the prospective jurors. i can't wait for the accused's story.
5. there are a lot of gay people in san francisco and i'm actually shocked by it. i know it's their mecca, but i'm blown away at how many there are in a random selection. and by "blown away", i'm using that term metaphorically.
6. i can see why judge judy has a temper.
1. if someone really wants to be excused from a jury, they will go to all ends to do it. they will say anything. they will admit to anything. and i'm not talking about the bullshit racist comments. there've been none of those. i'm talking ridiculous statements and rationalizations.
2. busy female lawyers don't dress well. in fact, i hold their outfits in contempt.
3. when the judge needs to call some more prospective jurors from the jury pool, everyone in the audience makes themselves as small as possible - even though their names are pulled from a random list. for reference, their reaction is the exact opposite than the audience from "the price is right".
4. stupid people put themselves into stupid situations where stupid things happen to them. it's amazing to see how bad things happen to people when they do nothing to stop them from happening - or are always open for them. san francisco is "jerry springer" but the trailers are victorians. by the way, i'm just talking about the prospective jurors. i can't wait for the accused's story.
5. there are a lot of gay people in san francisco and i'm actually shocked by it. i know it's their mecca, but i'm blown away at how many there are in a random selection. and by "blown away", i'm using that term metaphorically.
6. i can see why judge judy has a temper.
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
how to have a heart to heart, writer to writer
transcript of my meeting "the sports guy" bill simmons, author and rabid red sox fan, at his book signing in san francisco:
STEVE: "hey bill, nice to meet you".
BILL: "nice to meet you, too".
steve hands bill two books for him to sign. bill opens up one of them. he prepares to write, but steve's voice stops him.
STEVE: "it would really mean a lot to me and my brother if you just wrote 'page 168. number 13'. thanks."
BILL: "why? was is it?"
STEVE: "you don't want to know."
bill begins flipping through the book towards page 168.
BILL: "i need to know. i'm a writer. i need to know what i'm writing."
STEVE: "i'm also a writer, and trust me, you don't need to know."
bill reaches page 168 and reads #13 out loud.
BILL: (clearing his throat) "three pitches later: mookie slaps a grounder to first base...it rolls between buckner's legs and into rightfield...knight scores from second. mets 6, red sox 5. there are no words."
bill closes the book and looks at me.
BILL: "mets fan, huh?"
STEVE: "long suffering."
BILL: "i know how you feel."
bill scribbles something in the book and shows it to me. it reads "dear steve. there are no words. bill simmons."
steve nods his head in agreement.
STEVE: "could you do that for my brother too?"
STEVE: "hey bill, nice to meet you".
BILL: "nice to meet you, too".
steve hands bill two books for him to sign. bill opens up one of them. he prepares to write, but steve's voice stops him.
STEVE: "it would really mean a lot to me and my brother if you just wrote 'page 168. number 13'. thanks."
BILL: "why? was is it?"
STEVE: "you don't want to know."
bill begins flipping through the book towards page 168.
BILL: "i need to know. i'm a writer. i need to know what i'm writing."
STEVE: "i'm also a writer, and trust me, you don't need to know."
bill reaches page 168 and reads #13 out loud.
BILL: (clearing his throat) "three pitches later: mookie slaps a grounder to first base...it rolls between buckner's legs and into rightfield...knight scores from second. mets 6, red sox 5. there are no words."
bill closes the book and looks at me.
BILL: "mets fan, huh?"
STEVE: "long suffering."
BILL: "i know how you feel."
bill scribbles something in the book and shows it to me. it reads "dear steve. there are no words. bill simmons."
steve nods his head in agreement.
STEVE: "could you do that for my brother too?"
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
how i had a suspicious mind
at the end of my daily run yesterday morning in golden gate park, i passed by a short and aging elvis impersonator in full regalia. i got the impression that he was out for a stroll.
just wanted to share that with you.
just wanted to share that with you.
Monday, October 17, 2005
how there's massive, and then there's massive
i've seen a lot of massive home runs. i remember butch huskey hitting a bomb in the upper deck of veteran's stadium. i've seen mike piazza unloading and making the ball scream for mercy. i've seen balls dent scoreboards, i've seen balls find another orbit, and i've seen balls that seem like they'd never come back down. i've seen roy hobbs hit a ball so hard that the stitching came out.
hell, i live where barry bonds plays.
massive shots. all of them.
but i don't think i'll ever see as massive of a home run as the one albert pujols hit last night. and i'm not just talking distance (it had to go at least 450), but being down to your last strike with the season on the line and hitting this bomb that puts you up by one and into game six of the LCS.
massive, literally and metaphorically.
that massive.
hell, i live where barry bonds plays.
massive shots. all of them.
but i don't think i'll ever see as massive of a home run as the one albert pujols hit last night. and i'm not just talking distance (it had to go at least 450), but being down to your last strike with the season on the line and hitting this bomb that puts you up by one and into game six of the LCS.
massive, literally and metaphorically.
that massive.
how words need to be chosen wisely
while on my run in the park on saturday, i passed by a tented area which was a fundraiser for the "intimate partner violence awareness" group.
intimate partner violence awareness.
that's a strange coupling of words, huh? i had to think about them, put them together and then understand what it meant. okay, that took me all of three or four seconds, but it's not an obvious read at all.
and especially for such a good cause, that's not a good thing. seems like a catch-all to me.
in my mind, what would have worked better was "don't smack your bitch up weekend".
intimate partner violence awareness.
that's a strange coupling of words, huh? i had to think about them, put them together and then understand what it meant. okay, that took me all of three or four seconds, but it's not an obvious read at all.
and especially for such a good cause, that's not a good thing. seems like a catch-all to me.
in my mind, what would have worked better was "don't smack your bitch up weekend".
how there is an east coast bias
last year, the entire country galvanized behind the boston red sox as they marched their way towards their first world series championship since 1908. if you weren't wearing pinstripes or cardinal red, you were a red sox fan for the month of october, and it was a good feeling, a better story, an fantastic fairy tale.
this year, the chicago white sox are systematically crushing their way towards their first world series championship since 1917, and nobody can give two shits.
does an eight-year difference in droughts mean so much? or a different sock colorization?
you don't see anyone wearing white sox hats. you don't hear anyone rhapsodizing about konerko or podsednik or buerhle. you don't see women coming out of the wood work and claiming allegiance to a team they know nothing about.
there's not even much ado on the networks about it.
it's the same story, but different coverage.
sumthin' smells fishy.
this year, the chicago white sox are systematically crushing their way towards their first world series championship since 1917, and nobody can give two shits.
does an eight-year difference in droughts mean so much? or a different sock colorization?
you don't see anyone wearing white sox hats. you don't hear anyone rhapsodizing about konerko or podsednik or buerhle. you don't see women coming out of the wood work and claiming allegiance to a team they know nothing about.
there's not even much ado on the networks about it.
it's the same story, but different coverage.
sumthin' smells fishy.
Sunday, October 16, 2005
how i'm no longer giving the benefit of the doubt
i would always argue with my clients over not talking down to their audiences, that they're not stupid, that by talking to everyone you're talking to no one, and that audiences appreciate it more when you challenge them. that's what made "seinfeld" brilliant.
but movie companies and marketers still continue to treat people like idiots (then again, this country did re-elect bush). but, to be fair, it's incredibly insulting (like in big-budget summer blockbusters when movie companies put a "love story" in for "the women"), especially when they try to put demographics of people into neat little boxes.
but i don't believe in the practice of fitting everyone into a stereotype. in reality, it fits nobody.
but, you know what? i'm thinking about changing my stance on all this.
as i sat in the theater waiting for "the forty-year-old virgin", they played this trailer for this movie that's a blatant "brady bunch" ripoff - except not as clever. the crowd was rollicking, as if it were a farrelly brothers movie. i mean completely laughing hysterically, as if this were an amazing idea and that these jokes and gags were brand spanking new. i thought someone's head and guts were gonna explode.
did i mention that the crowd was full of adults?
so maybe i'm wrong about all this.
but movie companies and marketers still continue to treat people like idiots (then again, this country did re-elect bush). but, to be fair, it's incredibly insulting (like in big-budget summer blockbusters when movie companies put a "love story" in for "the women"), especially when they try to put demographics of people into neat little boxes.
but i don't believe in the practice of fitting everyone into a stereotype. in reality, it fits nobody.
but, you know what? i'm thinking about changing my stance on all this.
as i sat in the theater waiting for "the forty-year-old virgin", they played this trailer for this movie that's a blatant "brady bunch" ripoff - except not as clever. the crowd was rollicking, as if it were a farrelly brothers movie. i mean completely laughing hysterically, as if this were an amazing idea and that these jokes and gags were brand spanking new. i thought someone's head and guts were gonna explode.
did i mention that the crowd was full of adults?
so maybe i'm wrong about all this.
how losing can equal winning
i would love to say that yesterday's usc-notre dame football game was the best college football game i've ever seen. it probably was, but that qualifier would be that much more impressive if it came from someone who grew up with the sport. i will say it was one of the best football games i've ever seen, especially one that, by any standards, should have been a blowout. just some amazing heroics and effort. matt leinart is practically brady-like clutch. reggie bush is the new barry sanders. and brady quinn's got a bright future ahead of him. one of the top rivalries in sport just proved itself once more.
it's really startling what charlie wies has done with that team this year. of course, ty willingham did the same miracles with his first team in south bend. but this fighting irish team does look like one of the top teams in the country (shit, it was one bad bounce away from beating the best college football teams ever), and these aren't his players.
and with weis' former team, the patriots, losing to the broncos, dropping their record to 3-3, is it fair to say that there's more to the magic of charlie weis. he meant so much to the pats; he means so much to the irish. two teams that have his fingerprints on them lost this weekend, but we're just talking about the scores.
we're talking subtraction by subtraction and addition by addition.
we're talking about an irish renaissance.
i'm not a notre dame fan, but i think they make college football more interesting. and when you grew up without a team like i did, that's more than a little something to go on.
it's really startling what charlie wies has done with that team this year. of course, ty willingham did the same miracles with his first team in south bend. but this fighting irish team does look like one of the top teams in the country (shit, it was one bad bounce away from beating the best college football teams ever), and these aren't his players.
and with weis' former team, the patriots, losing to the broncos, dropping their record to 3-3, is it fair to say that there's more to the magic of charlie weis. he meant so much to the pats; he means so much to the irish. two teams that have his fingerprints on them lost this weekend, but we're just talking about the scores.
we're talking subtraction by subtraction and addition by addition.
we're talking about an irish renaissance.
i'm not a notre dame fan, but i think they make college football more interesting. and when you grew up without a team like i did, that's more than a little something to go on.
Saturday, October 15, 2005
how small statements are made
i read this on baseballmusings.com (which is a great website) and thought it was so funny that it deserved repeating here.
Book it now: Angels closer Francisco Rodriguez will be card No. 666 in the 2006 edition of Topps Total baseball cards.
Topps officials acknowledge that the employee who assembles the company's card checklists is a Yankees fan who assigns the undesirable number to the pitcher or player on the team that knocks the Yankees out of the playoffs.
That's why Red Sox reliever Keith Foulke, who got the last out of the 2004 ALCS, was number 666 in 2005 Total, and why the Florida Marlins' Josh Beckett of Spring, who beat the Yankees in the 2003 World Series finale, was 666 in the 2004 set.
And that's why Rodriguez, who closed out the Angels' victory Sunday in Game 5 of the Division Series, will be 666 in next year's set. It's the safest sure thing in the world of cardboard — unless Yankees Fan goes with Ervin Santana, who pitched 5 1/3 innings in relief of injured starter Bartolo Colon.
i'm not really all that sure about their predictions. after all, considering that the honor goes to the player who's most responsible for dealing the yanks out of the playoffs, i would be shocked if #666 isn't assigned to a-rod.
Book it now: Angels closer Francisco Rodriguez will be card No. 666 in the 2006 edition of Topps Total baseball cards.
Topps officials acknowledge that the employee who assembles the company's card checklists is a Yankees fan who assigns the undesirable number to the pitcher or player on the team that knocks the Yankees out of the playoffs.
That's why Red Sox reliever Keith Foulke, who got the last out of the 2004 ALCS, was number 666 in 2005 Total, and why the Florida Marlins' Josh Beckett of Spring, who beat the Yankees in the 2003 World Series finale, was 666 in the 2004 set.
And that's why Rodriguez, who closed out the Angels' victory Sunday in Game 5 of the Division Series, will be 666 in next year's set. It's the safest sure thing in the world of cardboard — unless Yankees Fan goes with Ervin Santana, who pitched 5 1/3 innings in relief of injured starter Bartolo Colon.
i'm not really all that sure about their predictions. after all, considering that the honor goes to the player who's most responsible for dealing the yanks out of the playoffs, i would be shocked if #666 isn't assigned to a-rod.
Friday, October 14, 2005
how i'm not backing down from my stance
when i tell people what my favorite movies are, i may come across as some sort of a film snob - which should come as no surprise, because i am a film snob.
and although it doesn't crack my top 10, when i tell people how much i adore and revere "porky's", everyone gets the feeling that i'm putting them on.
but i'm not. i really think it's a great flick.
beyond the incredibly funny scenes - the shower, the mole, lassie, mike hunt, the whorehouse - all of which are among the hardest i've ever laughed, there's a certain earnestness to the whole thing, about what it's like to be a reckless teenager.
it's described as a teen sex comedy, but there's only one real sex scene, and that's played for comedy - wa, wa, wooooooooooooo! - but there's also these strong storylines based around redneck america and high school camaraderie. just because there's teens and it revolves around a strip joint doesn't necessarily make it a "teen sex romp", which are basically translucent. there's a lot of well done shit in here.
don't get me wrong; it ain't "sunset boulevard". but i really think that once you get past the unfair stigma of "teen sex romp", it's really a damn good movie. well written, well directed, well edited.
it's really well done.
and i'm sticking to it.
and although it doesn't crack my top 10, when i tell people how much i adore and revere "porky's", everyone gets the feeling that i'm putting them on.
but i'm not. i really think it's a great flick.
beyond the incredibly funny scenes - the shower, the mole, lassie, mike hunt, the whorehouse - all of which are among the hardest i've ever laughed, there's a certain earnestness to the whole thing, about what it's like to be a reckless teenager.
it's described as a teen sex comedy, but there's only one real sex scene, and that's played for comedy - wa, wa, wooooooooooooo! - but there's also these strong storylines based around redneck america and high school camaraderie. just because there's teens and it revolves around a strip joint doesn't necessarily make it a "teen sex romp", which are basically translucent. there's a lot of well done shit in here.
don't get me wrong; it ain't "sunset boulevard". but i really think that once you get past the unfair stigma of "teen sex romp", it's really a damn good movie. well written, well directed, well edited.
it's really well done.
and i'm sticking to it.
Thursday, October 13, 2005
how wookies are americans too
i just read on cnn.com that the actor who played chewbacca in the star wars movies is about to become an american citizen.
why that news item deserves to be on cnn.com has not yet been determined, but that's not my point. unlike other actors who've played iconic characters, this photo is the first time i've ever seen him, in the flesh:

and in case you're wondering, the wookie is on the right.
why that news item deserves to be on cnn.com has not yet been determined, but that's not my point. unlike other actors who've played iconic characters, this photo is the first time i've ever seen him, in the flesh:

and in case you're wondering, the wookie is on the right.
how not to cover up a bad call
again, in the spirit of making yourself seem bulletproof, excuses have taken centerstage (and making things worse) than the smart way, of taking responsibility for a mistake.
last night, in the angles-white sox playoff game, angels pitcher kelvim escobar struck out sox hitter a.j. pierzinski on a pitch that may have been in the dirt. angels catcher josh paul caught it, umpire paul eddings rang him up and made the strike call, and everyone headed to the dugout - except for pierzinksi, who ran to first (a third strike has to be caught cleany, in case you don't know).
the umpires then called him safe at first.
now, whether it bounced or not the ball bounced is debatable and whether you get that right or not is human. it was the way the umpire changed his mind - or didn't let his call be known. nobody in that ballpark took his third-strike "mechanic" as anything other than "3rd out". that he got duped into changing his call is horrible.
it was a mistake - a fatal one, as three pitches later, he was driven home to win the game.
here's the problem: he made the call. he had no right to change it. and if that's not his "out" call, then there wasn't an out called in the whole game - or in the history of the game.
it was an out call, whether or not it was an out or not.
okay, it was a mistake. humans make mistakes.
but instead of taking responsibility, the umpires banded together and went off about how "the call was right" and that "he didn't call him out" and blah blah blah, when it's obvious that if pierzinksi didn't run, there would have been another inning to be played. and that if paul didn't think he caught the ball cleanly, he wouldn't have rolled it back to the mound before tagging him out. but with each excuse, it just sounds worse and worse and more incompetent.
this would have been nice: "although i originally called the batter out, i had a moment on indecision upon seeing pierzinski running to first base. upon further review, i should have stuck with my original call, but at that instant, i did not. i would like to apologize to the angels and their organization for my very human mistake." see, not so rough, huh?
instead, excuses, and making it worse.
bravo.
last night, in the angles-white sox playoff game, angels pitcher kelvim escobar struck out sox hitter a.j. pierzinski on a pitch that may have been in the dirt. angels catcher josh paul caught it, umpire paul eddings rang him up and made the strike call, and everyone headed to the dugout - except for pierzinksi, who ran to first (a third strike has to be caught cleany, in case you don't know).
the umpires then called him safe at first.
now, whether it bounced or not the ball bounced is debatable and whether you get that right or not is human. it was the way the umpire changed his mind - or didn't let his call be known. nobody in that ballpark took his third-strike "mechanic" as anything other than "3rd out". that he got duped into changing his call is horrible.
it was a mistake - a fatal one, as three pitches later, he was driven home to win the game.
here's the problem: he made the call. he had no right to change it. and if that's not his "out" call, then there wasn't an out called in the whole game - or in the history of the game.
it was an out call, whether or not it was an out or not.
okay, it was a mistake. humans make mistakes.
but instead of taking responsibility, the umpires banded together and went off about how "the call was right" and that "he didn't call him out" and blah blah blah, when it's obvious that if pierzinksi didn't run, there would have been another inning to be played. and that if paul didn't think he caught the ball cleanly, he wouldn't have rolled it back to the mound before tagging him out. but with each excuse, it just sounds worse and worse and more incompetent.
this would have been nice: "although i originally called the batter out, i had a moment on indecision upon seeing pierzinski running to first base. upon further review, i should have stuck with my original call, but at that instant, i did not. i would like to apologize to the angels and their organization for my very human mistake." see, not so rough, huh?
instead, excuses, and making it worse.
bravo.
Wednesday, October 12, 2005
how hypocracy starts at the top
does anyone else find it scary that president bush is exactly the same person as the enemies he fights?
this is from his address to a joint session of congress and the american people:
"The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics -- a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children."
but then he goes ahead and practices a fringe form of catholic extremism that has been rejected by most god-fearing catholics in the country. and, worse yet, he makes political decisions, like picking harrier miers because of her faith, because even his god knows she isn't even remotely qualified. it wasn't a political decision; it was a religious and loyalty decision - the same logistics found in the enemy we're fighting.
and then there's this in his speech:
They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.
is he talking about us or them, because a lack of freedom is exactly what's been going on in this country. beyond the restriction of freedoms they instituted upon us through censorship and scare tactics, what's really scary is the lack of freedom of religions. take a good look; there's no real diversity in his cabinet. don't get me wrong; he's got minorities. but he only has devout cathoilcs. there aren't any jews or protestants or muslims. it's just catholics trying to force their way of life on us. that's no freedom of religion.
i had this insane music teacher in high school, a born-again christian, who taught us that if you played "stairway to heaven" backwards you can hear satanic messages. to be honest, it actually was a cool class in that he was teaching us crazytalk.
he's a born-again. so is our president. miers is a twice born-again (don't know how that works).
these people run our government, the same people who we're protecting ourselves against.
ironic, huh?
this is from his address to a joint session of congress and the american people:
"The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics -- a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children."
but then he goes ahead and practices a fringe form of catholic extremism that has been rejected by most god-fearing catholics in the country. and, worse yet, he makes political decisions, like picking harrier miers because of her faith, because even his god knows she isn't even remotely qualified. it wasn't a political decision; it was a religious and loyalty decision - the same logistics found in the enemy we're fighting.
and then there's this in his speech:
They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.
is he talking about us or them, because a lack of freedom is exactly what's been going on in this country. beyond the restriction of freedoms they instituted upon us through censorship and scare tactics, what's really scary is the lack of freedom of religions. take a good look; there's no real diversity in his cabinet. don't get me wrong; he's got minorities. but he only has devout cathoilcs. there aren't any jews or protestants or muslims. it's just catholics trying to force their way of life on us. that's no freedom of religion.
i had this insane music teacher in high school, a born-again christian, who taught us that if you played "stairway to heaven" backwards you can hear satanic messages. to be honest, it actually was a cool class in that he was teaching us crazytalk.
he's a born-again. so is our president. miers is a twice born-again (don't know how that works).
these people run our government, the same people who we're protecting ourselves against.
ironic, huh?
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
how there's multiple definitions for "postponed indefinitely"
i was called for jury duty a couple of weeks back. like it is everywhere, you're instructed to call the day before to see if you have to come down to fulfill your service.
i did. and the recording said, and i'm somewhat paraphrasing, "the jury you have been selected for has been indefinitely postponed. you will be contacted later with further instructions."
cool. i'm off jury duty.
so i get a letter from the superior court of california for a "notice--failure to appear" and told that i was supposed to report for jury duty as instructed and that failure to respond to this notice would result in legal action and may result in a fine/incarceration.
what?
so i called the number and told them what happened, and they told me that i was supposed to call every night.
i said, "hold on. the recording said that it was postponed indefinitely".
"yes, but you're supposed to call every day. it says so in red in your jury duty handbook."
"but the recording said it was postponed indefintely. postponed indefinitely means that it ain't happening until further notice."
"yes, but you were supposed to call back."
"so i was supposed to call every day, even though what i was calling for was postponed indefinitely."
"yes, and you were called in."
"for something that was postponed indefinitely."
"yes."
"why doesn't it just say 'please call back tomorrow'?"
"because it says that in red in your jury duty handbook."
wow.
"you do understand how stupid that sounds, right?"
she was very nice on the phone and told me that this happens a lot, the recording needs to change, and that all i need to do is go down and fill out some paperwork. no harm, no foul.
postponed indefinitely. who knew there was leeway?
i did. and the recording said, and i'm somewhat paraphrasing, "the jury you have been selected for has been indefinitely postponed. you will be contacted later with further instructions."
cool. i'm off jury duty.
so i get a letter from the superior court of california for a "notice--failure to appear" and told that i was supposed to report for jury duty as instructed and that failure to respond to this notice would result in legal action and may result in a fine/incarceration.
what?
so i called the number and told them what happened, and they told me that i was supposed to call every night.
i said, "hold on. the recording said that it was postponed indefinitely".
"yes, but you're supposed to call every day. it says so in red in your jury duty handbook."
"but the recording said it was postponed indefintely. postponed indefinitely means that it ain't happening until further notice."
"yes, but you were supposed to call back."
"so i was supposed to call every day, even though what i was calling for was postponed indefinitely."
"yes, and you were called in."
"for something that was postponed indefinitely."
"yes."
"why doesn't it just say 'please call back tomorrow'?"
"because it says that in red in your jury duty handbook."
wow.
"you do understand how stupid that sounds, right?"
she was very nice on the phone and told me that this happens a lot, the recording needs to change, and that all i need to do is go down and fill out some paperwork. no harm, no foul.
postponed indefinitely. who knew there was leeway?
how i am in a quandary
i need some help on this situation: is the fact that i have crappy wide receivers on my fantasy football team:
A. a tragedy
B. a calamity
C. a catastrophe
D. heartbreak
E. a disaster
F. all of the above
you know where i stand on this issue.
damn you derrick mason, tory williamson and bobby engram.
or damn their quarterbacks. or their offensive coordinators.
don't they know what they're doing to my fantasy season?
heartless jackasses.
A. a tragedy
B. a calamity
C. a catastrophe
D. heartbreak
E. a disaster
F. all of the above
you know where i stand on this issue.
damn you derrick mason, tory williamson and bobby engram.
or damn their quarterbacks. or their offensive coordinators.
don't they know what they're doing to my fantasy season?
heartless jackasses.
how art should make you feel
my friend kathryn sent me this website. in short, people e-mail their deepest emotions and thoughts, and someone turns them into art (in the form of postcards). it's brutally touching - which is what art should do.
Monday, October 10, 2005
how reputations precede and prove themselves
ninth inning of the yanks-angels game. yanks down 2 runs.
coming up: jeter. a-rod. giambi.
or, rather:
jeter: the best postseason player ever, bar none.
a-rod: the biggest choker and least clutch player ever. bar none.
giambi: a damn good hitter.
those are their reputations (giambi also has the steroid thing, but that's another story).
my roommate brett and i came up with this scenario: jeter singles, a-rod hits into a double play, giambi then singles to keep the inning going.
and wouldn't you know it?
seriously, i think yankee fans would rather have stephen hawking holding a wiffleball bat in his mouth at the plate in a big situation than a-rod. unequivicably.
i'm not kidding about that.
coming up: jeter. a-rod. giambi.
or, rather:
jeter: the best postseason player ever, bar none.
a-rod: the biggest choker and least clutch player ever. bar none.
giambi: a damn good hitter.
those are their reputations (giambi also has the steroid thing, but that's another story).
my roommate brett and i came up with this scenario: jeter singles, a-rod hits into a double play, giambi then singles to keep the inning going.
and wouldn't you know it?
seriously, i think yankee fans would rather have stephen hawking holding a wiffleball bat in his mouth at the plate in a big situation than a-rod. unequivicably.
i'm not kidding about that.
how it's all on her record
everyone is up in arms about how, because she was never a judge, that supreme court nominee harriet miers has no record of any judgements.
i say p'shaw.
she recently stated that president george w. bush is "the most brilliant man she's ever met".
so there you go. it's on her record.
with acumen like that, she'd be perfect on the highest court in the land.
no, not that one she was nominated for, but the one with tommy chong, david crosby and the grateful dead.
i say p'shaw.
she recently stated that president george w. bush is "the most brilliant man she's ever met".
so there you go. it's on her record.
with acumen like that, she'd be perfect on the highest court in the land.
no, not that one she was nominated for, but the one with tommy chong, david crosby and the grateful dead.
how i don't understand me sometimes
i know i'm not the only person on the planet who hates it when someone decides that everyone around them is allowed to be privy to their loud cellphone conversation. in fact, i wish rickets and scurvy on those people. i know my friend the croz hates them too.
anyways, i'm on the 1-california headed west, and a chinese woman gets on while continuing her conversation on her cellphone - except she's speaking in chinese. obviously.
and, for some odd reason, i was even more incensed than usual.
when i cooled off hours later, i figured it out that if i am to be annoyed by someone's conversation, they should at least have the common courtesy of annoying me in my language, so i could gauge if it's worth it (which it never is).
how stupid is that?
very.
croz, help me out on this.
anyways, i'm on the 1-california headed west, and a chinese woman gets on while continuing her conversation on her cellphone - except she's speaking in chinese. obviously.
and, for some odd reason, i was even more incensed than usual.
when i cooled off hours later, i figured it out that if i am to be annoyed by someone's conversation, they should at least have the common courtesy of annoying me in my language, so i could gauge if it's worth it (which it never is).
how stupid is that?
very.
croz, help me out on this.
Sunday, October 09, 2005
how october means more
anyone who believes that baseball doesn't keep a strong fabric on our nation and our culture, well, they'll never get how someone like me can watch all 18 innings of the astros-braves game 4, how my stomach went up and down with each runner in scoring position, how to sit in awe as a 43-year-old pitcher threw three scoreless innings on two days rest, how just one mistake could mean everything, how one mistake did, and how i could get a little emotional for a game where i couldn't give two shits about either team playing.
and how my heart jumped as the astros players jumped at home plate waiting for their homerun hero run towards them.
and that's just one argument why october may be the best month in sports.
(although ask me that again in march).
and how my heart jumped as the astros players jumped at home plate waiting for their homerun hero run towards them.
and that's just one argument why october may be the best month in sports.
(although ask me that again in march).
Friday, October 07, 2005
how original "original joe's" really is
before the franz ferdinand concert at the bill graham auditorium last night, my buddy lawson and i ate some dinner and drank some beers at original joe's, a locally-famous eatery in the beautiful tenderloin area. and by beautiful, i mean downtrodden and decrepid. if you've ever watched "cops" filmed in san francisco, then you've seen the tenderloin.
and if you've ever smelled the scent emanating off a very old man, then you've got the feel of "original joe's".
the food is very large and damn good. it's guy food in a guy place - which shouldn't come as a surprise, considering there's nothing but guys and wheelchair-bound women in the place - like the loud table next to us, a group led by a boisterous man who looked like a fatter stacy keach. they debated non stop, using such talking points and evidence as "you're a pussy" and "fag!"
the decor is very "goodfellas", with poor leather seats and dim yellow lighting. all the waiters wear tuxedos for some reason.
after dinner, we sat at the bar. and these are the people we saw:
- a keyboardist playing background for a bunch of vocalists called "the uptown singers", which is odd, considering there is no uptown in san francisco. there's a downtown (the financial district) but nothing uptown - and if there was, it wouldn't really be anything to brag about.
- the lead guy of the uptown singers looked like hubie brown, circa when he coached the knicks in the 80s during his white 'fro days. this ain't what i'm referencing, but it's close enough.

his voice wasn't bad, very old-timey, like what you would hear off a 78 player that you have to wind up with a crank. he sang broadway tunes and asked everyone if they knew what musical it was from, and nobody had a guess. and why would they?
- the other singers, all in the their sixties, bringing their unique vocal stylings - but called up boy-girl-boy-girl. one guy with a beautiful operatic voice brought everyone down with "danny boy", but you got the feeling that's the only song he can sing. i, for one, would have like to have heard him tackle "99 problems" by jay-z. but that's just me.
- a drunk old man who sat next to us who ordered a sierra nevada, thanked the bartender upon recieiving it and then proceeded to pour sugar into his glass - for FIFTEEN CONTINUOUS SECONDS, forming a mountain of sugar on the bottom. oh yeah, he drank it.
- on our other side of us, a young blonde prostitute being "sweet talked" by her customer, a very hefty older man who looked like a dirtier and white-haired version of former allman brothers guitarist warren haynes.

that is, if warren haynes were sporting a white, ragged zz top beard.
- a bald man with thick black glasses and an exaggerated limp.
i know i have an overactive imagination, but seriously, all of this happened and all these people exist.
and thank god for that.
and if you've ever smelled the scent emanating off a very old man, then you've got the feel of "original joe's".
the food is very large and damn good. it's guy food in a guy place - which shouldn't come as a surprise, considering there's nothing but guys and wheelchair-bound women in the place - like the loud table next to us, a group led by a boisterous man who looked like a fatter stacy keach. they debated non stop, using such talking points and evidence as "you're a pussy" and "fag!"
the decor is very "goodfellas", with poor leather seats and dim yellow lighting. all the waiters wear tuxedos for some reason.
after dinner, we sat at the bar. and these are the people we saw:
- a keyboardist playing background for a bunch of vocalists called "the uptown singers", which is odd, considering there is no uptown in san francisco. there's a downtown (the financial district) but nothing uptown - and if there was, it wouldn't really be anything to brag about.
- the lead guy of the uptown singers looked like hubie brown, circa when he coached the knicks in the 80s during his white 'fro days. this ain't what i'm referencing, but it's close enough.

his voice wasn't bad, very old-timey, like what you would hear off a 78 player that you have to wind up with a crank. he sang broadway tunes and asked everyone if they knew what musical it was from, and nobody had a guess. and why would they?
- the other singers, all in the their sixties, bringing their unique vocal stylings - but called up boy-girl-boy-girl. one guy with a beautiful operatic voice brought everyone down with "danny boy", but you got the feeling that's the only song he can sing. i, for one, would have like to have heard him tackle "99 problems" by jay-z. but that's just me.
- a drunk old man who sat next to us who ordered a sierra nevada, thanked the bartender upon recieiving it and then proceeded to pour sugar into his glass - for FIFTEEN CONTINUOUS SECONDS, forming a mountain of sugar on the bottom. oh yeah, he drank it.
- on our other side of us, a young blonde prostitute being "sweet talked" by her customer, a very hefty older man who looked like a dirtier and white-haired version of former allman brothers guitarist warren haynes.

that is, if warren haynes were sporting a white, ragged zz top beard.
- a bald man with thick black glasses and an exaggerated limp.
i know i have an overactive imagination, but seriously, all of this happened and all these people exist.
and thank god for that.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
how things are gonna be better
i usually listen to howard stern during my morning runs. this is nothing new; for the past ten years, he's been beside my every step. and it's been difficult during my runs to not get angry and frustrated when you hear him complain about the labyrinthine measures of censorships placed upon him.
that's why his move (and my move) to sirius satellite in 45 days is a big deal.
and that's why i laughed my ass off during my run this morning.
sirius told howard that they were gonna run a test throughout the whole morning on his station. they wanted to put a morse code signal on it to check it out. howard had another idea.
beginning at 6:30 and running for four hours, howard had a procession of farters and queefers blow their talents for everyone to hear on satellite radio.
it's hysterical stuff, no matter how crass you might think it is.
yeah, it's gonna be a great ride.
that's why his move (and my move) to sirius satellite in 45 days is a big deal.
and that's why i laughed my ass off during my run this morning.
sirius told howard that they were gonna run a test throughout the whole morning on his station. they wanted to put a morse code signal on it to check it out. howard had another idea.
beginning at 6:30 and running for four hours, howard had a procession of farters and queefers blow their talents for everyone to hear on satellite radio.
it's hysterical stuff, no matter how crass you might think it is.
yeah, it's gonna be a great ride.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
how to do a catch-all
here's everything that doesn't fit in a posting.
1. i just watched a midas commercial featuring fred flintstone and barney rubble, except fred doesn't sound like fred. i don't know who fred sounds like, but it sure as hell ain't fred. which gets me off on another tangent: have you heard kermit the frog recently? well, you probably haven't, because he doesn't sound like kermit either. seriously, is it really that hard to find a fred flintstone or kermit the frog impersonator that sounds exactly like them? isn't that the one job where you really shouldn't take it "in another direction"? does this bother anyone else?
2. chien-meng wang is pitching tonight for the yankees. every time i hear his name, i automatically hear rodney dangerfield say "this place is restricted, wang, so don't tell them you're jewish". which makes me make this distinction: there are guys who can quote and get "caddyshack" references, and there are guys who just ain't guys.
3. really strong episodes of saturday night live, the office, curb your enthusiasm and arrested development this week - especially a.d. with their new character, a lawyer named bob loblaw, played by scott baio. best line: when the family had a typically insane consultation with him, jason bateman spoke up and said, "now i'm not gonna sit here and talk nonsense to bob loblaw." shit like that makes me jealous.
4. i don't think anyone can hit the astros in the playoffs. pettitte + clemens + oswalt * lidge = impossible to score upon.
5. i watched the rangers-flyers game in this new and improved sport called "hockey" or "hockie" (not sure which one, but it's played with sticks on ice), and i gotta say, the new rule changes made the game look pretty damn exciting for me. plenty of odd-numbered breaks and opportunities and, as my roommate brett noticed, a lot of teams scored five goals or more. that's a good thing.
6. there is no number six.
7. i know i may be a sap for saying this, but i really love the wheaties commercial about the slow-pitch softball game with the guy wearing a knee brace pops a homer over the right field wall to win the game - all while we hear the play-by-play of vin scully calling game 2 of the 1988 world series when a hobbled kirk gibson won the game by hitting his famously dramatic and improbable homer over the right field wall off dennis eckersely. it really gets to me - i remember where i was when i heard that call - and then when the guy pumps his fist rounding second - god, it's just perfectly done. thank you, whoever did it.
8. i am a sap. so sue me.
1. i just watched a midas commercial featuring fred flintstone and barney rubble, except fred doesn't sound like fred. i don't know who fred sounds like, but it sure as hell ain't fred. which gets me off on another tangent: have you heard kermit the frog recently? well, you probably haven't, because he doesn't sound like kermit either. seriously, is it really that hard to find a fred flintstone or kermit the frog impersonator that sounds exactly like them? isn't that the one job where you really shouldn't take it "in another direction"? does this bother anyone else?
2. chien-meng wang is pitching tonight for the yankees. every time i hear his name, i automatically hear rodney dangerfield say "this place is restricted, wang, so don't tell them you're jewish". which makes me make this distinction: there are guys who can quote and get "caddyshack" references, and there are guys who just ain't guys.
3. really strong episodes of saturday night live, the office, curb your enthusiasm and arrested development this week - especially a.d. with their new character, a lawyer named bob loblaw, played by scott baio. best line: when the family had a typically insane consultation with him, jason bateman spoke up and said, "now i'm not gonna sit here and talk nonsense to bob loblaw." shit like that makes me jealous.
4. i don't think anyone can hit the astros in the playoffs. pettitte + clemens + oswalt * lidge = impossible to score upon.
5. i watched the rangers-flyers game in this new and improved sport called "hockey" or "hockie" (not sure which one, but it's played with sticks on ice), and i gotta say, the new rule changes made the game look pretty damn exciting for me. plenty of odd-numbered breaks and opportunities and, as my roommate brett noticed, a lot of teams scored five goals or more. that's a good thing.
6. there is no number six.
7. i know i may be a sap for saying this, but i really love the wheaties commercial about the slow-pitch softball game with the guy wearing a knee brace pops a homer over the right field wall to win the game - all while we hear the play-by-play of vin scully calling game 2 of the 1988 world series when a hobbled kirk gibson won the game by hitting his famously dramatic and improbable homer over the right field wall off dennis eckersely. it really gets to me - i remember where i was when i heard that call - and then when the guy pumps his fist rounding second - god, it's just perfectly done. thank you, whoever did it.
8. i am a sap. so sue me.
how scientology works in mysterious ways
for everyone who questioned my "sources" about someone's "preferences", i guess this is a good slap in my face. but c'mon, you don't really believe this now, do you? i always thought his character from "born on the fourth of july" had a better chance of making this happen.
i leave the conspiracy theories to your own devices.
from imdb.com:
Never mind the wedding, when's the kid coming? People magazine has broken the news that Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are expecting their first child together. Cruise's publicist and sister, Lee Anne DeVette, related the news exclusively to the magazine that the couple was expecting, though she did not provide any further information regarding the baby's gender or due date. Lest you think this just a wacky story on People magazine's part, DeVette also confirmed to E! word of the impending arrival. This will be Holmes' first child and Cruise's first biological child, as he has two adopted children, Isabella and Conor, from his previous marriage to Nicole Kidman. So far, the engaged couple, who have been the subject of intense media coverage, have not yet set a wedding date.
i leave the conspiracy theories to your own devices.
from imdb.com:
Never mind the wedding, when's the kid coming? People magazine has broken the news that Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are expecting their first child together. Cruise's publicist and sister, Lee Anne DeVette, related the news exclusively to the magazine that the couple was expecting, though she did not provide any further information regarding the baby's gender or due date. Lest you think this just a wacky story on People magazine's part, DeVette also confirmed to E! word of the impending arrival. This will be Holmes' first child and Cruise's first biological child, as he has two adopted children, Isabella and Conor, from his previous marriage to Nicole Kidman. So far, the engaged couple, who have been the subject of intense media coverage, have not yet set a wedding date.
Sunday, October 02, 2005
how a little culture can't hurt y'all
i went to the bluegrass festival in golden gate park on sunday, which was full of non-football fans masquerading as bluegrass music fans.
i got there right after the giants trounced the rams behind eli manning's four touchdowns, plaxico burress' 200 yards receiving, tiki barber's 128 yards rushing and a defense which caused five fumbles.
i caught a couple of banjo bands - damn good banjo bands, might i add - and a vocalist that split the leaves around me. really fantastic stuff.
(and a quick aside: i really enjoy bluegrass music. it's very pure and honest. but i don't have to dress in overalls or pony-tail my hair to show my affection for it. then again, i wasn't the one masquerading today.)
but the real highlight was to check out my co-star, dolly parton. i watched her perform, and considering i've got context, i can say that she's exactly how you'd imagine her to be. rather, how she is on stage is how she is: eccentric, funny, real, laid back, straight up, warm, charismatic and extremely talented and skillful. extremely.
she sang all her hits and stuff from her new album, which are duets of covers of some of her favorite songs, like "crimson and clover" and "me and bobby mcgee" and she nailed them all. her talent as a writer is only overshadowed by her talent as a singer. she's just completely amazing.
and funny. after she sang "crimson and clover", she said, "y'know, the wind just blew my way, and i'm smellin' whatever it is y'all're smoking. and i can tell you, it ain't crimson or clover". really funny.
if you ever get a chance, just go see her. even if you don't like the music (you're a communist if you don't), you'll laugh your ass off.
as i walked back home, i caught emmylou harris performing. it's one thing to listen to a cd and hear her voice, but it's another to hear it live and really feel the pain and hard living that her voice sells. it's very visceral and gutteral. couldn't really see much of her - i was waaaaaay in the back - but i got a little overwhelmed.
so yeah, that was my sunday. eli manning, dolly parton and emmylou harris.
beats most sundays, huh?
i got there right after the giants trounced the rams behind eli manning's four touchdowns, plaxico burress' 200 yards receiving, tiki barber's 128 yards rushing and a defense which caused five fumbles.
i caught a couple of banjo bands - damn good banjo bands, might i add - and a vocalist that split the leaves around me. really fantastic stuff.
(and a quick aside: i really enjoy bluegrass music. it's very pure and honest. but i don't have to dress in overalls or pony-tail my hair to show my affection for it. then again, i wasn't the one masquerading today.)
but the real highlight was to check out my co-star, dolly parton. i watched her perform, and considering i've got context, i can say that she's exactly how you'd imagine her to be. rather, how she is on stage is how she is: eccentric, funny, real, laid back, straight up, warm, charismatic and extremely talented and skillful. extremely.
she sang all her hits and stuff from her new album, which are duets of covers of some of her favorite songs, like "crimson and clover" and "me and bobby mcgee" and she nailed them all. her talent as a writer is only overshadowed by her talent as a singer. she's just completely amazing.
and funny. after she sang "crimson and clover", she said, "y'know, the wind just blew my way, and i'm smellin' whatever it is y'all're smoking. and i can tell you, it ain't crimson or clover". really funny.
if you ever get a chance, just go see her. even if you don't like the music (you're a communist if you don't), you'll laugh your ass off.
as i walked back home, i caught emmylou harris performing. it's one thing to listen to a cd and hear her voice, but it's another to hear it live and really feel the pain and hard living that her voice sells. it's very visceral and gutteral. couldn't really see much of her - i was waaaaaay in the back - but i got a little overwhelmed.
so yeah, that was my sunday. eli manning, dolly parton and emmylou harris.
beats most sundays, huh?
Friday, September 30, 2005
how advertising can warp
i love what advertising can be. i hate what advertising has become.
i love the hope that i keep that one day, commercials would be thirty second films that would be better than the shitty sitcoms they interrupt, and that would cause television to raise their standards, which would cause advertisers to sharpen their tastes and take more risks. i love how the best ads are the best art you'll see and feel.
i hate how marketers use advertising to stain your perspective on things by painting a picture that might not normally be there, treating their audiences like idiots and talking to them as such by inundating them with stupid messages. it should be fun, like this website from bbdo where you get to nominate one of their employees to go to cannes. okay, it's not selling anything per se, but it's fun.
this is a joke, but it's true how all it takes is a good editor to give you an impression that isn't warranted, to twist how you should think about things. it might take awhile, but it's worth it. i laughed my ass off at the end, but it's everything can could be wrong about advertising.
and yes, i know this has been a ridiculous diatribe for a funny harmless bit.
i love the hope that i keep that one day, commercials would be thirty second films that would be better than the shitty sitcoms they interrupt, and that would cause television to raise their standards, which would cause advertisers to sharpen their tastes and take more risks. i love how the best ads are the best art you'll see and feel.
i hate how marketers use advertising to stain your perspective on things by painting a picture that might not normally be there, treating their audiences like idiots and talking to them as such by inundating them with stupid messages. it should be fun, like this website from bbdo where you get to nominate one of their employees to go to cannes. okay, it's not selling anything per se, but it's fun.
this is a joke, but it's true how all it takes is a good editor to give you an impression that isn't warranted, to twist how you should think about things. it might take awhile, but it's worth it. i laughed my ass off at the end, but it's everything can could be wrong about advertising.
and yes, i know this has been a ridiculous diatribe for a funny harmless bit.
how free time might not be the best time
with my freelance gig winding down, i was given today off. and what a gift - it's gotta be in the 80s without a cloud in the sky.
so, after bikram yoga last night that completely wiped me out, i decided to sleep in - which is something i never do. and with the day free, i've planned for a run and to sit in the park and do some writing. in short, really enjoy the outdoors today.
so i woke up around 10:30, checked my e-mail, walked around my apartment, got myself going, put on some running shorts and my ankle braces and, as i tied my sneakers, i put on the tv. but there's nothing really on at this time.
that is, except "jerry springer".
so springer it was.
an episode called "don't hurt the midget".
awesome.
you know where i'll be for the next hour.
the weather can wait.
so, after bikram yoga last night that completely wiped me out, i decided to sleep in - which is something i never do. and with the day free, i've planned for a run and to sit in the park and do some writing. in short, really enjoy the outdoors today.
so i woke up around 10:30, checked my e-mail, walked around my apartment, got myself going, put on some running shorts and my ankle braces and, as i tied my sneakers, i put on the tv. but there's nothing really on at this time.
that is, except "jerry springer".
so springer it was.
an episode called "don't hurt the midget".
awesome.
you know where i'll be for the next hour.
the weather can wait.
Thursday, September 29, 2005
how sports matter, they really matter
mike piazza will be playing his last game as a new york met on sunday.
or, simply, the best new york met ever will be playing his final game in that uniform.
for the past seven years, i have had the distinct pleasure of watching the best hitting catcher in the history of baseball play for my team. he'll wind up as best slugging met ever, second on the mets all-time RBI list, second in home runs, third in total bases, ninth in games played and, most importantly, as the guy who led us to within three games of a world championship in 2000.
and that's not counting the chills that iced my spine every time when there were runners on base and the PA announcer would say, with pride, "stepping up to the plate, number thirty-one, catcher, mike piazza!" and know that the other team is shitting a brick.
yeah, i'm gonna miss those feelings.
but, as much as i'll miss them, i'll always have this: my most memorable sports moment ever.
i don't care to give a description of the emotions we all went through after 9/11. it was tough on all of us, obviously, and for us new yorkers, it was indeed the end of the world and a phoenix of a new one.
baseball took a hiatus for about a week, and when it came back, it was sorely needed.
the mets played the hated atlanta braves in the first game back, the first break we had since 9/11, the first chance we had to do something else but mourn. the mets wore NYPD and FDNY hats in honor and with the utmost respect. we all weeped during the national anthem and "god bless america" during the 7th inning - even as i watched this game in my living room, in san francisco, 3000 miles away.
but i was there. nobody can tell me otherwise..
the mets were down one run with two outs in the bottom of the eighth. john smoltz was dominant. he's always dominant, but on this night, he was special. but someone was on base for the mets - i don't remember who it was, but it didn't matter once we heard it, we all heard it:
"stepping up to the plate, number thirty-one, catcher, mike piazza!"
chills. ice. fear.
but smoltz was amazing. he wasn't backing down from anything.
smoltz got ahead in the count. piazza had two strikes on him. smoltz threw a fastball that i swore - and probably everyone else - hit the black on the inside corner. smoltz started walking off the mound, a definite third strike, end of inning, but the umpire disagreed.
a new life.
again, apropro.
and then, it happened.
i'll never forget that swing, and how the ball jumped off the bat as if injected with kerosene, and i never saw it clear the fence because i was jumping up and down, up and down, up and down, and i called my dad, 3000 miles away but so close to ground zero, and piazza did it, dad, he did it, and i was crying, goddamn i was crying and laughing because it was right, it was just so right, it was everything we needed.
new york needed it and piazza delivered.
thank you, mike, for everything, truly everything.
good luck.
or, simply, the best new york met ever will be playing his final game in that uniform.
for the past seven years, i have had the distinct pleasure of watching the best hitting catcher in the history of baseball play for my team. he'll wind up as best slugging met ever, second on the mets all-time RBI list, second in home runs, third in total bases, ninth in games played and, most importantly, as the guy who led us to within three games of a world championship in 2000.
and that's not counting the chills that iced my spine every time when there were runners on base and the PA announcer would say, with pride, "stepping up to the plate, number thirty-one, catcher, mike piazza!" and know that the other team is shitting a brick.
yeah, i'm gonna miss those feelings.
but, as much as i'll miss them, i'll always have this: my most memorable sports moment ever.
i don't care to give a description of the emotions we all went through after 9/11. it was tough on all of us, obviously, and for us new yorkers, it was indeed the end of the world and a phoenix of a new one.
baseball took a hiatus for about a week, and when it came back, it was sorely needed.
the mets played the hated atlanta braves in the first game back, the first break we had since 9/11, the first chance we had to do something else but mourn. the mets wore NYPD and FDNY hats in honor and with the utmost respect. we all weeped during the national anthem and "god bless america" during the 7th inning - even as i watched this game in my living room, in san francisco, 3000 miles away.
but i was there. nobody can tell me otherwise..
the mets were down one run with two outs in the bottom of the eighth. john smoltz was dominant. he's always dominant, but on this night, he was special. but someone was on base for the mets - i don't remember who it was, but it didn't matter once we heard it, we all heard it:
"stepping up to the plate, number thirty-one, catcher, mike piazza!"
chills. ice. fear.
but smoltz was amazing. he wasn't backing down from anything.
smoltz got ahead in the count. piazza had two strikes on him. smoltz threw a fastball that i swore - and probably everyone else - hit the black on the inside corner. smoltz started walking off the mound, a definite third strike, end of inning, but the umpire disagreed.
a new life.
again, apropro.
and then, it happened.
i'll never forget that swing, and how the ball jumped off the bat as if injected with kerosene, and i never saw it clear the fence because i was jumping up and down, up and down, up and down, and i called my dad, 3000 miles away but so close to ground zero, and piazza did it, dad, he did it, and i was crying, goddamn i was crying and laughing because it was right, it was just so right, it was everything we needed.
new york needed it and piazza delivered.
thank you, mike, for everything, truly everything.
good luck.
how to attack a level 8 kotter
i had to get a haircut. i felt like i was about to be attacked by my curly tangle.
seriously, i was squarely within level 8 kotter, and slowly but surely making my way towards level 9 kotter, which would put me under direct police supervision.
and really, wouldn't you keep a sharp eye on a dude with this on his head?

aaaaanyway, since i left work early, and it was such a nice day, i decided to stop off in cole valley at a boutique called "the mane attraction" (yes, i'm aware of the pun). i asked if they had any openings; they had.
they saw the dilemma on top of my head, and quickly sprung to action, as if there were a doubt.
you see, who else better to attack a level 8 kotter than a gay black man with curly hair?
unfortunately, he wasn't freddie "boom boom" washington. in fact, he had the style of lenny kravitz, but was the bastard child of eddy grant ("electric avenue" singer) and sheryl lee ralph ("it's a living") - but more her than him.
chop chop chop buzz chop chop.
i usually have this irrational fear that a hair stylist is able to read my thoughts as they cut my hair, that all my secret information would be released, follicle by follicle. as i began to worry about my really quick observation about my hair cutter, i suddenly began to think that maybe, just maybe, he would get mad and seek revenge (or turned on and seek a thrill). but then another stylist (a gay man with straight blond hair and candy striped pants - that was not a joke) quickly showed me a photo of jackie onassis and informed me that she is how a first lady should look like, as if i cared.
obviously, he misread my mind.
anyway, it worked. i'm now back to a very respectable level 3 kotter. i can now walk the streets without suspicion.
i thank you. the world thanks you.
seriously, i was squarely within level 8 kotter, and slowly but surely making my way towards level 9 kotter, which would put me under direct police supervision.
and really, wouldn't you keep a sharp eye on a dude with this on his head?

aaaaanyway, since i left work early, and it was such a nice day, i decided to stop off in cole valley at a boutique called "the mane attraction" (yes, i'm aware of the pun). i asked if they had any openings; they had.
they saw the dilemma on top of my head, and quickly sprung to action, as if there were a doubt.
you see, who else better to attack a level 8 kotter than a gay black man with curly hair?
unfortunately, he wasn't freddie "boom boom" washington. in fact, he had the style of lenny kravitz, but was the bastard child of eddy grant ("electric avenue" singer) and sheryl lee ralph ("it's a living") - but more her than him.
chop chop chop buzz chop chop.
i usually have this irrational fear that a hair stylist is able to read my thoughts as they cut my hair, that all my secret information would be released, follicle by follicle. as i began to worry about my really quick observation about my hair cutter, i suddenly began to think that maybe, just maybe, he would get mad and seek revenge (or turned on and seek a thrill). but then another stylist (a gay man with straight blond hair and candy striped pants - that was not a joke) quickly showed me a photo of jackie onassis and informed me that she is how a first lady should look like, as if i cared.
obviously, he misread my mind.
anyway, it worked. i'm now back to a very respectable level 3 kotter. i can now walk the streets without suspicion.
i thank you. the world thanks you.
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
how strange occurances can be ironic
had a very strange occurance as i took the train home this evening. i made a playlist called "nostalgia" on my ipod which is filled with songs that evoke something, whether it be a photo, joke, person or a memory. as i listened to "kate" by the ben folds five ("when words fail, she speaks/her mix tape's a masterpiece"), i was sure that the next song was to be "harvest moon" by neil young. i internally swore by it. and, lo and behold, it was.
the odd thing was that there's 46 songs in the playlist, and i had it on shuffle. that's like a 2% chance of me getting it right. but i felt it in my bones. there was no doubt.
weird.
anyways, a very unassuming woman sat next to me with her own set of earphones, except they were attached to her walkman - not a radio one, but a cassette player. i haven't seen one of them in years. in fact, while thinking about it, i realized that it's two generations old. i see people with discmans on the trains, and everybody's got an ipod, but seriously, over the past four years, this is the only one of these relics i've seen.
i didn't know what to say.
which made me wonder - is her mix tape her masterpiece?
hold on...is this kate?
the odd thing was that there's 46 songs in the playlist, and i had it on shuffle. that's like a 2% chance of me getting it right. but i felt it in my bones. there was no doubt.
weird.
anyways, a very unassuming woman sat next to me with her own set of earphones, except they were attached to her walkman - not a radio one, but a cassette player. i haven't seen one of them in years. in fact, while thinking about it, i realized that it's two generations old. i see people with discmans on the trains, and everybody's got an ipod, but seriously, over the past four years, this is the only one of these relics i've seen.
i didn't know what to say.
which made me wonder - is her mix tape her masterpiece?
hold on...is this kate?
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
how not everything makes sense
i had a dream that my friend johnny luxury and i were a ukulele band that covered weezer songs - but only the "pinkerton" album. we split vocals. he played the bass uke while i played acoustic. we ended our set with "why bother".
i don't know why or what that means.
but i also read an article co-written by the sports guy and chuck klosterman (two of my favorite writers) and chuck mentioned "pinkerton" in the article - which is so strange, considering there's no real reason to mention it. then again, he did do it justice as the weezer album that was critically panned but is beloved by a small minority - myself included.
nobody mentions it. i thought of it. he said it. strange.
and it's not the first time that's happened recently.
so it's time for a test: i watched "zapped!" this weekend.
let's see what happens.
in other news: i was witness to a woman who ordered $27.95 worth of food and proceeded to give the cashier $40.70, but the 70 cents were all pennies.
don't get me wrong: i love insubordination like that, but not when i have to order food. couth, people. a little couth.
i don't know why or what that means.
but i also read an article co-written by the sports guy and chuck klosterman (two of my favorite writers) and chuck mentioned "pinkerton" in the article - which is so strange, considering there's no real reason to mention it. then again, he did do it justice as the weezer album that was critically panned but is beloved by a small minority - myself included.
nobody mentions it. i thought of it. he said it. strange.
and it's not the first time that's happened recently.
so it's time for a test: i watched "zapped!" this weekend.
let's see what happens.
in other news: i was witness to a woman who ordered $27.95 worth of food and proceeded to give the cashier $40.70, but the 70 cents were all pennies.
don't get me wrong: i love insubordination like that, but not when i have to order food. couth, people. a little couth.
Monday, September 26, 2005
how the 80s never fail to entertain
there are few things that i enjoy any more than when horrifyingly simple 1980s animation series are re-edited for our enjoyment 20 years later.
like when prince adam from "he-man" sings a 4 non blondes song that sets a new bar for creepy. i mean, that's good, but it still doesn't hold a candle to any of the classic and insanely bizarre g.i. joe public service announcements, like "body massage", "ice", "carnival" and "gay".
but that's just me.
like when prince adam from "he-man" sings a 4 non blondes song that sets a new bar for creepy. i mean, that's good, but it still doesn't hold a candle to any of the classic and insanely bizarre g.i. joe public service announcements, like "body massage", "ice", "carnival" and "gay".
but that's just me.
Friday, September 23, 2005
how i love my hometown for all the wrong reasons
there's a t-shirt that old navy just made that says "staten island: just pave it".
i find that funny, considering i grew up in staten island and it's a cesspool.
but here's the best part of it: here's an article in the staten island advance in which staten islanders talk about how they like the shirt because it's about the bad roads in the borough.
seriously.
in case you don't want to read through all the pain, here's some quotes.
again, this is for a shirt that says "Staten Island: Just Pave It":
"The shirt has nothing to do with new construction," said Damato, a builder since 1974. "This has to do with unpaved roads, like Amboy Road, needing to be paved."
"I take it to mean the roads really need paving, and they do. They're bad from all the traffic," said Enrico Cucco.
"I like it," said Angela Cucco, as she helped her husband unload groceries outside the Dongan Hills home of their daughter, Maria Mihailos. "You look at it [the steamroller] and you say, 'It's necessary.' Things have to be done; the roads have to be paved."
seriously. can you beat that?
i just love the idea that these people thought that old navy company, in conjunction with gap inc and banana republic, surveyed the geological and transportational hazards inherent within the five boroughs, did some research analysis by consulting with various construction companies and landscaping agencies, and thought that the best way to solve staten island's asphalt problems or even to just shed light on them is to display a call to action on a t-shirt that would sell for $8.
awesome. how i love my hometown.
(of course, there are others in the article who realize the humor. of course, i'm assuming those people also leave the island every so often and have an idea of perspective. which means, they found both of them.)
i find that funny, considering i grew up in staten island and it's a cesspool.
but here's the best part of it: here's an article in the staten island advance in which staten islanders talk about how they like the shirt because it's about the bad roads in the borough.
seriously.
in case you don't want to read through all the pain, here's some quotes.
again, this is for a shirt that says "Staten Island: Just Pave It":
"The shirt has nothing to do with new construction," said Damato, a builder since 1974. "This has to do with unpaved roads, like Amboy Road, needing to be paved."
"I take it to mean the roads really need paving, and they do. They're bad from all the traffic," said Enrico Cucco.
"I like it," said Angela Cucco, as she helped her husband unload groceries outside the Dongan Hills home of their daughter, Maria Mihailos. "You look at it [the steamroller] and you say, 'It's necessary.' Things have to be done; the roads have to be paved."
seriously. can you beat that?
i just love the idea that these people thought that old navy company, in conjunction with gap inc and banana republic, surveyed the geological and transportational hazards inherent within the five boroughs, did some research analysis by consulting with various construction companies and landscaping agencies, and thought that the best way to solve staten island's asphalt problems or even to just shed light on them is to display a call to action on a t-shirt that would sell for $8.
awesome. how i love my hometown.
(of course, there are others in the article who realize the humor. of course, i'm assuming those people also leave the island every so often and have an idea of perspective. which means, they found both of them.)
how people can't help but dig bigger graves
i'm rafael palmeiro.
i went in front of a steriod fact finding panel in front of congress, pointed both my finger and mustache at them and the camera, and said, "i have never, ever, taken performance enhancing drugs", even though i was implicated in a book by jose canseco, magically transformed myself from a singles hitter into a home-run hitter the day i met him and have had rumors about my steroid use swirling around me for years.
still, i am convincing.
then, months later, i am found to be guilty of the thing i swore that i never did. and, not only that, it's for stanozolol, which is so potent a steroid that it would be impossible for me to accidentally take it.
i am a scourge. my legacy has been tarnished. i am a national joke. everything i worked for has been shat on. all those rumors about me have been confirmed. and now congress is after me for perjury.
i need to make a statement. i promised to clean the air. it's been 57 days.
i could bite the bullet and say that i made a terrible mistake, and that i could only wish that the youth of today can see what i'm going through and learn from that. i could become an ambassador of being clean by using myself as an example of what went wrong. i wouldn't save my legacy; i would be starting a new one.
or i could try to weasel out of it some more and bring everyone else down with me, like my teammate miguel tejada, by claiming that he supplied me with a "dietary supplement" that may have "triggered the steroid", even though i damn well know that he's innocent and that i injected myself.
yeah. that'll work. it's not my fault, you see. he gave it to me. point your finger at him. i'm not the only guilty one. i hope they'll buy my story.
but now it's coming out that tejada's dietary supplement, B-12, is a legal supplement and in no way can trigger stanozolol, which again, is an extremely potent steroid that cannot be accidentally injected into my system. also, that tejada has been tested three times cleanly and that even B-12 has been tested and cleared.
crap.
so not only am i a cheat and a liar, but i'm also a rat as well, and completely unwelcomed into any baseball clubhouse or hall of fame for the rest of my life.
am i a very stupid man?
no. nobody calls me stupid.
i went in front of a steriod fact finding panel in front of congress, pointed both my finger and mustache at them and the camera, and said, "i have never, ever, taken performance enhancing drugs", even though i was implicated in a book by jose canseco, magically transformed myself from a singles hitter into a home-run hitter the day i met him and have had rumors about my steroid use swirling around me for years.
still, i am convincing.
then, months later, i am found to be guilty of the thing i swore that i never did. and, not only that, it's for stanozolol, which is so potent a steroid that it would be impossible for me to accidentally take it.
i am a scourge. my legacy has been tarnished. i am a national joke. everything i worked for has been shat on. all those rumors about me have been confirmed. and now congress is after me for perjury.
i need to make a statement. i promised to clean the air. it's been 57 days.
i could bite the bullet and say that i made a terrible mistake, and that i could only wish that the youth of today can see what i'm going through and learn from that. i could become an ambassador of being clean by using myself as an example of what went wrong. i wouldn't save my legacy; i would be starting a new one.
or i could try to weasel out of it some more and bring everyone else down with me, like my teammate miguel tejada, by claiming that he supplied me with a "dietary supplement" that may have "triggered the steroid", even though i damn well know that he's innocent and that i injected myself.
yeah. that'll work. it's not my fault, you see. he gave it to me. point your finger at him. i'm not the only guilty one. i hope they'll buy my story.
but now it's coming out that tejada's dietary supplement, B-12, is a legal supplement and in no way can trigger stanozolol, which again, is an extremely potent steroid that cannot be accidentally injected into my system. also, that tejada has been tested three times cleanly and that even B-12 has been tested and cleared.
crap.
so not only am i a cheat and a liar, but i'm also a rat as well, and completely unwelcomed into any baseball clubhouse or hall of fame for the rest of my life.
am i a very stupid man?
no. nobody calls me stupid.
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
how this could be the next big thing
there should be something - like the closed-captioned button - that you can press that eliminates the laugh track from tv shows.
humor is poking. humor is twisting. and, most importantly, humor is relative. not everyone is gonna find "the office" or "arrested development" funny (those people are also wrong), and not everyone is gonna find rob schneider to be funny either (and for good reason).
we laugh at things we can relate to, but not everybody can relate to the same things. so when everybody laughs, something is wrong. comedy is meant to offend. if it pisses someone off, it's done its job.
so there's no real point to laugh tracks, other than to cover up how unfunny their show is or, in a more revealing expose, to show us how stupid network producers think their audiences are. it's pandering and hand-holding to its most degrading form. "laugh here! that was funny!...now laugh here!....and here!...damn you, this is humor! laugh here!"
that's why laugh tracks make me sick.
where's that button?
humor is poking. humor is twisting. and, most importantly, humor is relative. not everyone is gonna find "the office" or "arrested development" funny (those people are also wrong), and not everyone is gonna find rob schneider to be funny either (and for good reason).
we laugh at things we can relate to, but not everybody can relate to the same things. so when everybody laughs, something is wrong. comedy is meant to offend. if it pisses someone off, it's done its job.
so there's no real point to laugh tracks, other than to cover up how unfunny their show is or, in a more revealing expose, to show us how stupid network producers think their audiences are. it's pandering and hand-holding to its most degrading form. "laugh here! that was funny!...now laugh here!....and here!...damn you, this is humor! laugh here!"
that's why laugh tracks make me sick.
where's that button?
how i've almost never laughed as hard
two things:
last night's season premiere of "the office" with steve carell was so incredibly uncomfortable and embarassing that i couldn't stop laughing. seriously, they deserve any accolades they get. they took a perfectly written, directed and acted british telly series and are just as good. if you're not hooked, get hooked.
and i stumbled upon this website that offers interesting commentary and insight to the players on 1980s baseball cards - otherwise known as the cheesiest photography ever shot. there's two pages of the funniest shit around. enjoy.
last night's season premiere of "the office" with steve carell was so incredibly uncomfortable and embarassing that i couldn't stop laughing. seriously, they deserve any accolades they get. they took a perfectly written, directed and acted british telly series and are just as good. if you're not hooked, get hooked.
and i stumbled upon this website that offers interesting commentary and insight to the players on 1980s baseball cards - otherwise known as the cheesiest photography ever shot. there's two pages of the funniest shit around. enjoy.
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
how not taking yourself seriously always works
i love this ad about big beer and big ads.
it's the kind of work i want to do.
damn them for doing it first.
then again, thank them for doing it.
it's the kind of work i want to do.
damn them for doing it first.
then again, thank them for doing it.
how mistakes are never learned
i don't watch "everybody loves raymond". i've seen a couple of episodes and i got it. it's the same ol' sitcom shit that's always been on and always will, except the writing is better.
that being said, there's no reason for a spinoff. but, supposedly brad garrett's getting his own series, and his character is moving away.
what genius! what a brilliant idea! that's never been done before! awesome work, cbs! you've one-upped us once more! hooray, television!
okay, sarcasm aside, spinoffs involving a semi-retarted main character moving away has never worked.
seriously, think about it:
joey was, and that failed.
gloria stivic acted like she was, and that failed.
someone named chachi had to be, and that failed.
i'll stop here. and before anyone e-mails me, frazier worked, but that's because he obviously wasn't semi-retarted. there was something smart in that series, that character, that allowed it to have its own feet to stand on. it's called depth.
depth. wow, now that's an idea to build upon.
nah.
that being said, there's no reason for a spinoff. but, supposedly brad garrett's getting his own series, and his character is moving away.
what genius! what a brilliant idea! that's never been done before! awesome work, cbs! you've one-upped us once more! hooray, television!
okay, sarcasm aside, spinoffs involving a semi-retarted main character moving away has never worked.
seriously, think about it:
joey was, and that failed.
gloria stivic acted like she was, and that failed.
someone named chachi had to be, and that failed.
i'll stop here. and before anyone e-mails me, frazier worked, but that's because he obviously wasn't semi-retarted. there was something smart in that series, that character, that allowed it to have its own feet to stand on. it's called depth.
depth. wow, now that's an idea to build upon.
nah.
how the best keeps on getting better
thank god fox didn't cancel "arrested development" because last night's season premiere was one of their funniest episodes ever - and that's coming from a very long line of funniest episodes ever from one of the funniest shows ever.
if you've never, you should. it's not as standard as "everybody loves raymond" or formulaic as "friends". it's completely original, unlike anything else seen on tv with the most uncomfortable pauses ever and the most ridiculous self-absorbed characters ever created.
and while you're at it, check out "the family guy" on sunday nights on fox.
this posting was made possible by a grant from the fox broadcasting network.
if you've never, you should. it's not as standard as "everybody loves raymond" or formulaic as "friends". it's completely original, unlike anything else seen on tv with the most uncomfortable pauses ever and the most ridiculous self-absorbed characters ever created.
and while you're at it, check out "the family guy" on sunday nights on fox.
this posting was made possible by a grant from the fox broadcasting network.
how choices have to be made
i got this e-mail from my friend paal, and thought it was worth posting.
This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. Try not to give a rushed answer. Read the text and then give an honest answer.
There is chaos all around you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of biblical proportions.
You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.
You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury.
Suddenly you see a man floundering in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer . . . somehow the man looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it is.
It's George W. Bush! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to pull him under.
You have two options--you can save the life of G.W. Bush or you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful men.
So here's the question below, and please give an honest answer :
Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the classic simplicity of black and white?
makes you wonder.
This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. Try not to give a rushed answer. Read the text and then give an honest answer.
There is chaos all around you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of biblical proportions.
You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.
You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury.
Suddenly you see a man floundering in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer . . . somehow the man looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it is.
It's George W. Bush! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to pull him under.
You have two options--you can save the life of G.W. Bush or you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful men.
So here's the question below, and please give an honest answer :
Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the classic simplicity of black and white?
makes you wonder.
Monday, September 19, 2005
how you gotta keep on going
i know this gets old, but here's another friend who's running a marathon through team in training. again, money donated goes to the fight against leukemia.
so, if you've got some extra change, help tami run and raise.
thanks.
so, if you've got some extra change, help tami run and raise.
thanks.
Sunday, September 18, 2005
how you never stop learning
two things i learned this weekend:
1. that peter cetera was hired by chicago because of his skillz as a bassist. he became a vocalist years later, when he claimed that "he was a man who would fight for your honor".
2. when you have sex without a condom or without birth control, it's called "pulling the goalie".
i am now a better man.
1. that peter cetera was hired by chicago because of his skillz as a bassist. he became a vocalist years later, when he claimed that "he was a man who would fight for your honor".
2. when you have sex without a condom or without birth control, it's called "pulling the goalie".
i am now a better man.
how you can't be too early
as i waited for my flight to arrive as i headed back to oakland from los angeles, i happened to be the first person on line for priority B seating for southwest airlines (they switched gates, so i wound up going from last on line to first on line. don't be impressed. it just meant i got to sit further up in the plane).
aaaanyway, the first people on line for priority A seating were three raiders fans on the way up for their game against the chiefs in oakland. they were exactly how you would imagine raiders fans would be, and they were dressed from head to toe in black and silver and tattoos.
one of them wore facepaint. i asked him how did he was able to get through security. he told me that he painted it all on in the bathroom.
so picture the scene. three raiders superfans, one with facepaint, waiting on line in LAX.
our plane arrived at the gate, and as the passengers filed off, the raiders fans, and i shit you not, started to heckle everyone who walked off. some of it was pretty offensive and crude. and i would have been plenty pissed off if i weren't laughing my ass off internally at how completely ridiculous the whole scene was.
think about it: they were five hours and three hundred miles away from kickoff, and they had their game on.
i'm not saying i condoned it, but it was awesome.
aaaanyway, the first people on line for priority A seating were three raiders fans on the way up for their game against the chiefs in oakland. they were exactly how you would imagine raiders fans would be, and they were dressed from head to toe in black and silver and tattoos.
one of them wore facepaint. i asked him how did he was able to get through security. he told me that he painted it all on in the bathroom.
so picture the scene. three raiders superfans, one with facepaint, waiting on line in LAX.
our plane arrived at the gate, and as the passengers filed off, the raiders fans, and i shit you not, started to heckle everyone who walked off. some of it was pretty offensive and crude. and i would have been plenty pissed off if i weren't laughing my ass off internally at how completely ridiculous the whole scene was.
think about it: they were five hours and three hundred miles away from kickoff, and they had their game on.
i'm not saying i condoned it, but it was awesome.
Thursday, September 15, 2005
how the airport never disappoints
people i saw at the oakland airport today, en route to los angeles:
1. the vegas guy - i rode with him on the bart shuttle from the train to the airport. during the course of his extremely loud cell phone call, i learned that he rocks vegas, he got into a $1000/hand table his last time at the mirage and that he was on his way to los angeles to pick his friend up and then it's vegas, baby, vegas. i also loved the fact that he had priority "C" seating which means that he had to wait until all the "A" and "B" travelers boarded and sat before he could get on. in fact, that one bit of information restored my faith in a higher being.
2. confused gender role couple - she wore a button down shirt, pleated black dress pants, penny loafers and a haircut reminiscent of joe pesci's in "goodfellas". he wore a black j.crew ribbed sweater, black pants, black shoes, a beige checkerboard blazer and wire-rimmed glasses. and when he successfully tossed his coffee cup into a dumpster, he pumped his hands as if he were syaing "yippee!"
3. the "is she retarted or not?" older chinese woman - she sat next to me on the plane. her granddaughter had the task of not only buckling her into her seat belt, but also to pick up her garbage for her - all tasks that anyone over six can handle. she didn't seem retarted or incapable (she did go to the bathroom by herself), and she spoke well (then again, i had no idea what she was saying) - but she didn't lift a finger the whole trip and never bothered to. my favorite part was when the granddaughter showed her what to do in case the plane crashes. not for nothing, but if someone can't buckle themself in, then, in a plane crash, they in essense become a floatational device. that's not mean. it's just treading water is much more difficult than buckling in.
1. the vegas guy - i rode with him on the bart shuttle from the train to the airport. during the course of his extremely loud cell phone call, i learned that he rocks vegas, he got into a $1000/hand table his last time at the mirage and that he was on his way to los angeles to pick his friend up and then it's vegas, baby, vegas. i also loved the fact that he had priority "C" seating which means that he had to wait until all the "A" and "B" travelers boarded and sat before he could get on. in fact, that one bit of information restored my faith in a higher being.
2. confused gender role couple - she wore a button down shirt, pleated black dress pants, penny loafers and a haircut reminiscent of joe pesci's in "goodfellas". he wore a black j.crew ribbed sweater, black pants, black shoes, a beige checkerboard blazer and wire-rimmed glasses. and when he successfully tossed his coffee cup into a dumpster, he pumped his hands as if he were syaing "yippee!"
3. the "is she retarted or not?" older chinese woman - she sat next to me on the plane. her granddaughter had the task of not only buckling her into her seat belt, but also to pick up her garbage for her - all tasks that anyone over six can handle. she didn't seem retarted or incapable (she did go to the bathroom by herself), and she spoke well (then again, i had no idea what she was saying) - but she didn't lift a finger the whole trip and never bothered to. my favorite part was when the granddaughter showed her what to do in case the plane crashes. not for nothing, but if someone can't buckle themself in, then, in a plane crash, they in essense become a floatational device. that's not mean. it's just treading water is much more difficult than buckling in.
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
how the end was near
it seems almost trivial to post this, considering what happened in new orleans, but i had a major catastrophe in my life last night, which again seems trivial, but to me, it meant everything.
after two months of an intensive labor of love, i was a little bit of effort away from finishing a fifteen-minute film about my friends getting married that would premiere at their rehearsal dinner in a place called the old silent film theater in hollywood. my first movie on a big screen, and it's something i'm very proud of - my best work ever.
all i had to do was place in some voiceover and import some title cards. easy stuff.
that is, if i had a movie to do it for.
it was gone - rather, my external hard drive wasn't able to be mounted on my desktop. that's where i saved it. and now, i couldn't get to it. so not only was this film gone, but also every film i had ever finished, my professional reel, my professional book, photographs and tons of applications that i moved from my desktop to the external to free up some space.
gone. unable to be accessed.
my last three years. kaput.
everything i've ever worked for. vanished.
i frantically called my friend russ, who was my IT guy at my old agency. he was kind enough to invite me and my external hard drive over for him to give a valiant attempt to save it. while he fidgeted with it, i ran to my office, where i happened to download quicktimes of the wedding film onto my desktop. it would be a quick burn onto a dvd, and with non-stop work ahead of me, i could at least salvage a crappy version of the film to show on friday night.
that was my first priority: the most important day of my friend's life. the wreck of mine could come later.
a quick burn took an hour, and with each minute i thought about everything - the hard work, the weekends, the late nights, the love, the passion, the learning, the miracles, the luck, my past and my future. and i realized that it all may be lost, but it's not gone - i had copies of everything, but i'd lose the masters. and some photos saved. and i couldn't even calculate how much in missing software.
you know, just the stuff that can't be replaced.
as it burned, i called russ to check on his progress, and it's amazing how much you can tell from someone's voice as he searches for just a small glimpse of light. no matter how he spun it, i didn't buy it.
as the burn finished, i walked back to his place, and i just geared myself up for a long night of getting this film done and then weeks of trying to get everything else replaced through friends and savvy.
if i told you that i wasn't on the verge of crying, i'd be lying.
if i told you that i thought about many dark things, i'd be lying.
perhaps i shouldn't say more.
when i got to russ' front door, he and his wife quickly looked up at me, as if they know that someone i knew had died and they were the bearers of bad news.
shit.
and he had news. he found it all by rescuing the external hard drive. it just needed a new chassis. it was all there, just how i left it.
could you believe that?
if i told you that my nerves took a deep breath, i'd be lying.
if i told you i haven't stopped smiling, i'd be lying.
thank you, russ.
after two months of an intensive labor of love, i was a little bit of effort away from finishing a fifteen-minute film about my friends getting married that would premiere at their rehearsal dinner in a place called the old silent film theater in hollywood. my first movie on a big screen, and it's something i'm very proud of - my best work ever.
all i had to do was place in some voiceover and import some title cards. easy stuff.
that is, if i had a movie to do it for.
it was gone - rather, my external hard drive wasn't able to be mounted on my desktop. that's where i saved it. and now, i couldn't get to it. so not only was this film gone, but also every film i had ever finished, my professional reel, my professional book, photographs and tons of applications that i moved from my desktop to the external to free up some space.
gone. unable to be accessed.
my last three years. kaput.
everything i've ever worked for. vanished.
i frantically called my friend russ, who was my IT guy at my old agency. he was kind enough to invite me and my external hard drive over for him to give a valiant attempt to save it. while he fidgeted with it, i ran to my office, where i happened to download quicktimes of the wedding film onto my desktop. it would be a quick burn onto a dvd, and with non-stop work ahead of me, i could at least salvage a crappy version of the film to show on friday night.
that was my first priority: the most important day of my friend's life. the wreck of mine could come later.
a quick burn took an hour, and with each minute i thought about everything - the hard work, the weekends, the late nights, the love, the passion, the learning, the miracles, the luck, my past and my future. and i realized that it all may be lost, but it's not gone - i had copies of everything, but i'd lose the masters. and some photos saved. and i couldn't even calculate how much in missing software.
you know, just the stuff that can't be replaced.
as it burned, i called russ to check on his progress, and it's amazing how much you can tell from someone's voice as he searches for just a small glimpse of light. no matter how he spun it, i didn't buy it.
as the burn finished, i walked back to his place, and i just geared myself up for a long night of getting this film done and then weeks of trying to get everything else replaced through friends and savvy.
if i told you that i wasn't on the verge of crying, i'd be lying.
if i told you that i thought about many dark things, i'd be lying.
perhaps i shouldn't say more.
when i got to russ' front door, he and his wife quickly looked up at me, as if they know that someone i knew had died and they were the bearers of bad news.
shit.
and he had news. he found it all by rescuing the external hard drive. it just needed a new chassis. it was all there, just how i left it.
could you believe that?
if i told you that my nerves took a deep breath, i'd be lying.
if i told you i haven't stopped smiling, i'd be lying.
thank you, russ.
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
how there's always something
no matter how bad things get, just remember that you can always find something to make you feel a little better about yourself.
available in all sizes.
available in all sizes.
Monday, September 12, 2005
how to give thanks to someone who's been thanked enough
we all have memories for a reason. these are some of mine.
on may 25, 1994, the eve of game six against the devils, in a series down 3-2, rangers center mark messier guarantees a victory with the words "we'll win tonight".
not only do they win, but he registers a hat trick and an assist, a heavy hand in all four rangers goals.
three weeks later, he leads the rangers to their first stanley cup victory in 54 years.
you can degrade sports all you want. but they produce moments, god those moments, that real life just can't compete with - such as that night at the garden when the rangers won and lifted the cup over their heads, that last long minute, the way messier kissed the cup, the way we worshipped richter and leetch, the wails of relief and happiness from those there and those nearby, especially the loud ruckus coming from the living room in staten island by a family of four.
it's the first stanley cup my father claimed as his own in his lifetime, a gift that i could never give to him myself.
today, the man who gave all that to me, my family and countless long-suffering rangers fans retired.
i guess i should say, "thank you, mark", but that really doesn't seem like much, is it?
on may 25, 1994, the eve of game six against the devils, in a series down 3-2, rangers center mark messier guarantees a victory with the words "we'll win tonight".
not only do they win, but he registers a hat trick and an assist, a heavy hand in all four rangers goals.
three weeks later, he leads the rangers to their first stanley cup victory in 54 years.
you can degrade sports all you want. but they produce moments, god those moments, that real life just can't compete with - such as that night at the garden when the rangers won and lifted the cup over their heads, that last long minute, the way messier kissed the cup, the way we worshipped richter and leetch, the wails of relief and happiness from those there and those nearby, especially the loud ruckus coming from the living room in staten island by a family of four.
it's the first stanley cup my father claimed as his own in his lifetime, a gift that i could never give to him myself.
today, the man who gave all that to me, my family and countless long-suffering rangers fans retired.
i guess i should say, "thank you, mark", but that really doesn't seem like much, is it?
Sunday, September 11, 2005
how there's always a little more to be done
if anyone has any spare change around, here's yet another charity: it's a donation to my friend's team, Angels for Christine, in an effort to raise some more money to help in the fight against leukemia.
they are marching in the Light The Night Walk, which is The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's nationwide evening walk to build awareness of blood cancers and raise funds for cures. walkers carry illuminated balloons-white for survivors and red for supporters-to celebrate and commemorate lives touched by cancer.
i know i ask a lot, but there's so much to be done.
thanks.
they are marching in the Light The Night Walk, which is The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's nationwide evening walk to build awareness of blood cancers and raise funds for cures. walkers carry illuminated balloons-white for survivors and red for supporters-to celebrate and commemorate lives touched by cancer.
i know i ask a lot, but there's so much to be done.
thanks.
how good shines through
i posted some of this before, but my friend anthony just wrote his full transcript of his migration from new orleans back to birmingham in the wake of katrina, and i don't know what to say.
here it goes, from start to finish. if you already read part one, just skip down to the hyphens for part two. or just read it again.
"Katrina"
Being a writer, I thought I’d write.
Saturday: It is about 6 pm and we make the decision to evacuate our homes and apartments at 2 AM the following morning. The clan consists of myself, my wife Cheryl, her parents, her sister and her three-year-old son. Our brother in-law, a parish employee, had to stay behind to work. We packed what we thought would be necessary for what we believed would be a three-day excursion. A mini vacation to Little Rock, Arkansas perhaps. The irony of letters ARK does not escape me.
We opt to drive together as a group, leaving a car, a truck and everything else behind.
Sunday: We arrive in Little Rock at about noon after eating at an IHOP just around Tallula, LA. Suddenly, we have a pool, a balcony view, someone preparing continental breakfast every morning and the luxury of all luxuries, a maid. As we begin to try to contact people, we learn that the 504 area code is worthless. We learn that there is no power, no running water and no sewer system. We are unaware of the location of grandparents, friends, co-workers, etc. The notion of unemployment and homelessness begin to set in. We also have in the back of our minds that our house in Birmingham hasn’t sold. Although, I can never understand the complexity of The Almighty, I at least have the answer to the question: God, why won’t our house sell?
The executive decision is made and we pull our house off the market.
Monday: The same all day – watching the news, calling cell phones and hearing what I have now committed to memory, “I’m sorry, due to the hurricane, all systems are busy, please try your call again.” Today, it occurs to me that without local bank phones, financial questions can’t be answered and in thinking that the gulf coast has lost millions in casino revenue, your everyday ATM has become the new slot machine. Any amount of withdrawal is three cherries.
And then there are the looters.
Watching people ransacking retail outlets is an odd thing. On the one hand you think, well they need to survive – that is the mode they are in. On the other hand, as you see people carrying things like Nike shoes, suits and jewelry out of stores you used to legally purchase such things, you think – shoot on site. To me these are the sub-humans that New Orleans is full of. “The zoo,” I angrily tell my wife, “has flooded.”
Somehow, we manage to see our apartment on the news – Look there’s my car! Oh look, there’s the water. Being a mile from Cheryl’s parents’ house, we deem that indeed the entire city of Kenner, just minutes from the airport, is underwater. The biblical story of JOB quickly comes to mind. If you have never read it – do so. The malls, the Blockbusters, homes, cars, everything is submerged to some degree. Knowing this only helps slightly. I say this because once you come to grips with total loss, you truly can only look forward.
There is no yesterday.
Tuesday: More of the same. Clothes are getting worn. We go to the local Chuck E. Cheese to blow off some tension. We had a lot of fun, one of us had too much fun, and for those that know me well, that person was not my three-year-old nephew, Cian (Key-an). You can lose everything but your sense of humor, I suppose. More calls are made to re-establish ourselves in Birmingham. The idea now is to harbor who we have in tow and hunker down for the month they are saying we will have to wait to return. To what, however, we have no idea.
Wednesday: Cheryl’s mom’s birthday. 61. The only thing I can think about is that for her birthday she has been given one more day. As of today, none of us know much about our jobs, homes and family members. Although we do get word that grandparents are alive. Thank God. We are also getting calls from friends offering help. Our love goes out to them. Ah, something else we have not lost.
---
The images on tv show the worst in people, but I can now tell you that times like these also bring out the absolute very best. The emails and phone calls come pouring in with offers of help.
We meet a man in the hotel lobby. I see he has a blind cane ticking around on the ground. He approaches us jokingly saying he can see shapes and edges and to not be alarmed. He sits down and asks us our story and tells us that he is from just around Kilgore, TX and that he has driven (ok, maybe he rode) all the way to Little Rock to meet with a friend of his from Louisiana to sit and listen and pray with him. Just to be with him. This man had lost his sight and was there simply to give his ears. My 5’ 5” frame seems even lower, now.
We get calls from dear friends, Pshone (Shawn) and Michael Grace and Jim Temple in Jackson, MS. This is a town that lost power and has gas lines for miles and they had the blessed nature to consider that we would have to pass through Jackson on our way home and asked if there was anything they could give us. We also got a call from our friends, Jaime and Winston Baccus, who live in Memphis and realize that Little Rock, AR is just close enough to meet halfway. They too say they want to help in any way they can. I humbly suggest, “the essentials.” As he pulls out the TV set from his car my mouth hits the floor. “You gotta watch college football,” he says. He had a point. Him and his wife also had piles of sheets, pots, pans, soap, towels, glasses, paper goods, cups, and gift cards to Wal-mart. Guess we’ll get some essentials. I think a new pair of socks would be nice. Cheryl and I couldn’t believe it. We were now in utter shock, as this tremendous act of kindness came on the heels of two people in Wendy’s buying us dinner upon hearing that we were from New Orleans. Awesome. Some of Cheryl’s old co-workers learn that we are returning with family in tow and call with offerings of essentials, you know, like a washer and dryer. We don’t even know what to say.
Sean, our brother in-law calls! He is alive and well. He has to continue working to get any machinery back in order. Without a ‘Hello’, the first thing he says is, “If you can make it to your house in Birmingham, don’t come back. Cause there ain’t Sh–… If you’ve met him, you’d know this is followed with a chuckle at his self-proclaimed authority on all things messed up. He’s a mechanic, and a good one too, because with his no holds barred bluntness, he even repaired my stressed nerves all the way from Louisiana with his cell phone barely audible.
Thursday: 8 AM. We’re leaving the hotel, our home away from home away from home to head toward Monroe to get to a bank. We needed to transfer funds and prepare for the realization that we would soon be setting up an account in Alabama. Along the way we get a call from our real estate agent Sherry Conde who tells us she had taken the liberty of contacting a corporate housing furnishing company to try to set all of us up with beds. Oh and in her spare time, also to make some homemade soup to eat when we get there. Wow. I was speechless. But I soon learn that the words would come even harder later. After a while, I get another call from her saying it didn’t work out. “No problem, thanks for the thought,” I say. Instead she says, and this is where I almost run off the road crying, “I emailed a friend of mine about your situation and she has found someone who is going to give you all his furniture used for a lake house.” “What?!” I said. “”Who?” “Well, the company that is getting involved is Lewis Communications. Do you know them?” This is the agency I moved to Birmingham to work for back in 2002 and left in 2004. Spencer Till made the call and has a U-haul set up to make a couple of stops to get his and Beth Bailey’s loaner furniture. I can’t believe my ears. I can’t even tell my wife without my voice cracking. I drove the rest of the way in silent prayer, just amazed.
When we arrive at the house, there are people at the top of our driveway. They are neighbors who heard we were coming back and decided to set up air mattresses for everyone with sheets and pillows. Cheryl’s mom and sister are now streaming tears. We go in to the house to find toys for Cian (very important to occupy the child) and some toiletries.
After we unload the cars and stare at all the stuff we have been absolutely blessed to receive, the doorbell rings. It is another neighbor with a warm apple pie and some more household items. “Figured you might be hungry.” Can you believe these people? Before leaving he prays with the family. A final neighbor stops by and offers help should we need it. Other offers came in via phone as we settled in.
Then, it all hits me. Today is exactly 6 months to the day that I started working in New Orleans. Cheryl and I turned down a 6-month contract deal there, opting for me to be full-time. I would have been walking back into the house either way. Wow, are we not in control or what?
When all is said and done, this tragedy will be of Biblical proportions. Knowing that it is written in the Good Book that the measure you deal out will be dealt back to you, yes, indeed it will be Biblical.
The first things we will humbly buy with those Wal-mart gift cards are thank you cards.
Man, I’m going miss that maid.
Thank you all for your thoughts, prayers and concerns.
If any one reading this is ever in need let us know, we will be storing stuff to pass on.
We love you all.
here it goes, from start to finish. if you already read part one, just skip down to the hyphens for part two. or just read it again.
"Katrina"
Being a writer, I thought I’d write.
Saturday: It is about 6 pm and we make the decision to evacuate our homes and apartments at 2 AM the following morning. The clan consists of myself, my wife Cheryl, her parents, her sister and her three-year-old son. Our brother in-law, a parish employee, had to stay behind to work. We packed what we thought would be necessary for what we believed would be a three-day excursion. A mini vacation to Little Rock, Arkansas perhaps. The irony of letters ARK does not escape me.
We opt to drive together as a group, leaving a car, a truck and everything else behind.
Sunday: We arrive in Little Rock at about noon after eating at an IHOP just around Tallula, LA. Suddenly, we have a pool, a balcony view, someone preparing continental breakfast every morning and the luxury of all luxuries, a maid. As we begin to try to contact people, we learn that the 504 area code is worthless. We learn that there is no power, no running water and no sewer system. We are unaware of the location of grandparents, friends, co-workers, etc. The notion of unemployment and homelessness begin to set in. We also have in the back of our minds that our house in Birmingham hasn’t sold. Although, I can never understand the complexity of The Almighty, I at least have the answer to the question: God, why won’t our house sell?
The executive decision is made and we pull our house off the market.
Monday: The same all day – watching the news, calling cell phones and hearing what I have now committed to memory, “I’m sorry, due to the hurricane, all systems are busy, please try your call again.” Today, it occurs to me that without local bank phones, financial questions can’t be answered and in thinking that the gulf coast has lost millions in casino revenue, your everyday ATM has become the new slot machine. Any amount of withdrawal is three cherries.
And then there are the looters.
Watching people ransacking retail outlets is an odd thing. On the one hand you think, well they need to survive – that is the mode they are in. On the other hand, as you see people carrying things like Nike shoes, suits and jewelry out of stores you used to legally purchase such things, you think – shoot on site. To me these are the sub-humans that New Orleans is full of. “The zoo,” I angrily tell my wife, “has flooded.”
Somehow, we manage to see our apartment on the news – Look there’s my car! Oh look, there’s the water. Being a mile from Cheryl’s parents’ house, we deem that indeed the entire city of Kenner, just minutes from the airport, is underwater. The biblical story of JOB quickly comes to mind. If you have never read it – do so. The malls, the Blockbusters, homes, cars, everything is submerged to some degree. Knowing this only helps slightly. I say this because once you come to grips with total loss, you truly can only look forward.
There is no yesterday.
Tuesday: More of the same. Clothes are getting worn. We go to the local Chuck E. Cheese to blow off some tension. We had a lot of fun, one of us had too much fun, and for those that know me well, that person was not my three-year-old nephew, Cian (Key-an). You can lose everything but your sense of humor, I suppose. More calls are made to re-establish ourselves in Birmingham. The idea now is to harbor who we have in tow and hunker down for the month they are saying we will have to wait to return. To what, however, we have no idea.
Wednesday: Cheryl’s mom’s birthday. 61. The only thing I can think about is that for her birthday she has been given one more day. As of today, none of us know much about our jobs, homes and family members. Although we do get word that grandparents are alive. Thank God. We are also getting calls from friends offering help. Our love goes out to them. Ah, something else we have not lost.
---
The images on tv show the worst in people, but I can now tell you that times like these also bring out the absolute very best. The emails and phone calls come pouring in with offers of help.
We meet a man in the hotel lobby. I see he has a blind cane ticking around on the ground. He approaches us jokingly saying he can see shapes and edges and to not be alarmed. He sits down and asks us our story and tells us that he is from just around Kilgore, TX and that he has driven (ok, maybe he rode) all the way to Little Rock to meet with a friend of his from Louisiana to sit and listen and pray with him. Just to be with him. This man had lost his sight and was there simply to give his ears. My 5’ 5” frame seems even lower, now.
We get calls from dear friends, Pshone (Shawn) and Michael Grace and Jim Temple in Jackson, MS. This is a town that lost power and has gas lines for miles and they had the blessed nature to consider that we would have to pass through Jackson on our way home and asked if there was anything they could give us. We also got a call from our friends, Jaime and Winston Baccus, who live in Memphis and realize that Little Rock, AR is just close enough to meet halfway. They too say they want to help in any way they can. I humbly suggest, “the essentials.” As he pulls out the TV set from his car my mouth hits the floor. “You gotta watch college football,” he says. He had a point. Him and his wife also had piles of sheets, pots, pans, soap, towels, glasses, paper goods, cups, and gift cards to Wal-mart. Guess we’ll get some essentials. I think a new pair of socks would be nice. Cheryl and I couldn’t believe it. We were now in utter shock, as this tremendous act of kindness came on the heels of two people in Wendy’s buying us dinner upon hearing that we were from New Orleans. Awesome. Some of Cheryl’s old co-workers learn that we are returning with family in tow and call with offerings of essentials, you know, like a washer and dryer. We don’t even know what to say.
Sean, our brother in-law calls! He is alive and well. He has to continue working to get any machinery back in order. Without a ‘Hello’, the first thing he says is, “If you can make it to your house in Birmingham, don’t come back. Cause there ain’t Sh–… If you’ve met him, you’d know this is followed with a chuckle at his self-proclaimed authority on all things messed up. He’s a mechanic, and a good one too, because with his no holds barred bluntness, he even repaired my stressed nerves all the way from Louisiana with his cell phone barely audible.
Thursday: 8 AM. We’re leaving the hotel, our home away from home away from home to head toward Monroe to get to a bank. We needed to transfer funds and prepare for the realization that we would soon be setting up an account in Alabama. Along the way we get a call from our real estate agent Sherry Conde who tells us she had taken the liberty of contacting a corporate housing furnishing company to try to set all of us up with beds. Oh and in her spare time, also to make some homemade soup to eat when we get there. Wow. I was speechless. But I soon learn that the words would come even harder later. After a while, I get another call from her saying it didn’t work out. “No problem, thanks for the thought,” I say. Instead she says, and this is where I almost run off the road crying, “I emailed a friend of mine about your situation and she has found someone who is going to give you all his furniture used for a lake house.” “What?!” I said. “”Who?” “Well, the company that is getting involved is Lewis Communications. Do you know them?” This is the agency I moved to Birmingham to work for back in 2002 and left in 2004. Spencer Till made the call and has a U-haul set up to make a couple of stops to get his and Beth Bailey’s loaner furniture. I can’t believe my ears. I can’t even tell my wife without my voice cracking. I drove the rest of the way in silent prayer, just amazed.
When we arrive at the house, there are people at the top of our driveway. They are neighbors who heard we were coming back and decided to set up air mattresses for everyone with sheets and pillows. Cheryl’s mom and sister are now streaming tears. We go in to the house to find toys for Cian (very important to occupy the child) and some toiletries.
After we unload the cars and stare at all the stuff we have been absolutely blessed to receive, the doorbell rings. It is another neighbor with a warm apple pie and some more household items. “Figured you might be hungry.” Can you believe these people? Before leaving he prays with the family. A final neighbor stops by and offers help should we need it. Other offers came in via phone as we settled in.
Then, it all hits me. Today is exactly 6 months to the day that I started working in New Orleans. Cheryl and I turned down a 6-month contract deal there, opting for me to be full-time. I would have been walking back into the house either way. Wow, are we not in control or what?
When all is said and done, this tragedy will be of Biblical proportions. Knowing that it is written in the Good Book that the measure you deal out will be dealt back to you, yes, indeed it will be Biblical.
The first things we will humbly buy with those Wal-mart gift cards are thank you cards.
Man, I’m going miss that maid.
Thank you all for your thoughts, prayers and concerns.
If any one reading this is ever in need let us know, we will be storing stuff to pass on.
We love you all.
Friday, September 09, 2005
how mistaken identity is fun
there's a guy out there whom i never met whose e-mail address is extremely close to mine, and either he gives my address out to people he doesn't want to talk to again or to people who don't know how to spell. he's some sort of international yachting playboy, and it blows my mind how many different women from different parts of the world he has "touched" (i found out his game years ago when i replied back to an e-mail, and she told me everything she knew).
anyway, here's a piece of the latest e-mail i got from a complete stranger about a complete stranger.
Remember us the English girls who saved your arse, (literally) in bangkok from a lady boy!!! Had a good laugh those nights we spent together, one in particular which we won't be forgetting in a hurry!
wtf??
yep, it's a life more interesting than mine.
anyway, here's a piece of the latest e-mail i got from a complete stranger about a complete stranger.
Remember us the English girls who saved your arse, (literally) in bangkok from a lady boy!!! Had a good laugh those nights we spent together, one in particular which we won't be forgetting in a hurry!
wtf??
yep, it's a life more interesting than mine.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
how walgreens might be a little behind the times
overheard by me while buying gum:
CASHIER #1: so this internet thing is really taking off?
CASHIER #2: s'pose so.
CASHIER #1: and people can really get online from home, huh?
i don't know what to say.
CASHIER #1: so this internet thing is really taking off?
CASHIER #2: s'pose so.
CASHIER #1: and people can really get online from home, huh?
i don't know what to say.
how you can't trust the 'stache
as i took muni into work this morning, i sat across from a man with a rollie fingers "curly-q" mustache.
he wore suspenders, much like you would assume one with that mustache would.
he was burly, again meeting expectations.
picture him in your head.
yep, that's him - exactly.
except that he was reading a romance novel with a barechested fabio on the front cover.
umm...what?
i expected someone with that 'stache to be reading a book about civil war machinery. or maybe one about the best barroom brawlers of all time. or maybe one about home construction. i expected something manly.
but, then again, why? it is a "curly-q", after all, the most femininine of staches. maybe i believed only a man full of bravado can be brave enough to adorn lip fuzz like that.
maybe it's beefsteak charlie's fault. he had that 'stache, and he made steaks, and steaks are manly.
ugh. my world has been shaken.
he wore suspenders, much like you would assume one with that mustache would.
he was burly, again meeting expectations.
picture him in your head.
yep, that's him - exactly.
except that he was reading a romance novel with a barechested fabio on the front cover.
umm...what?
i expected someone with that 'stache to be reading a book about civil war machinery. or maybe one about the best barroom brawlers of all time. or maybe one about home construction. i expected something manly.
but, then again, why? it is a "curly-q", after all, the most femininine of staches. maybe i believed only a man full of bravado can be brave enough to adorn lip fuzz like that.
maybe it's beefsteak charlie's fault. he had that 'stache, and he made steaks, and steaks are manly.
ugh. my world has been shaken.
how there are no friendly skies
i suppose i always realized this, but i finally put it together last night on my flight back from boston:
when i fly, i get gaseous.
really, really gaseous.
and if you don't believe me, ask the person in 35F.
when i fly, i get gaseous.
really, really gaseous.
and if you don't believe me, ask the person in 35F.
Sunday, September 04, 2005
how everything deserves questions
some quick thoughts from the weekend:
frusion is fruit + fusion. when i think of something being fused together, i think of a welding mask and sparks. plus, since two things need to be fused together, and one of them is fruit, then i ask you, "praytell, what is the other?" that's too many doubts for me. i ain't drinking that thing.
at the a's-yankees game tonight, my roommate and i watched as a man went up to the condiment bar and proceeded to refill his ketchup bottle that he brought with him. of course, this brought about a two inning discussion, where we decided that the act in itself wasn't just cheap, but also psychotic. i mean, he saved 75 cents by doing that. the best part is the conversation he had before he went to the park - "honey, i'm going to the game tonight." "have a nice time, dear. hey, while you're there, can you fill up this ketchup bottle with some of that free stuff?" yep, this is surely a woman's idea. call me a chauvinist, but a man would never do that or even think of doing that under his own volition.
i actually agree with what kanye west said within a majority, but i think his timing is completely distasteful. he has every right to his opinion, but there's a time and a place, and a telethon to help the hurricane victims isn't it. that being said, his new album "late registration" is completely amazing, a mesmerizing display of his incredible talents as a songwriter, producer and lyricist. it's completely original in every way - every single way. and that makes it not just a great rap album; it's a great album period. check it out.
and i really didn't like the season-ending episode of "entourage" at all. everything was forced, really forced in - and this is coming from a series that was so masterful at being so effable that it was so comforting just to sit back and watch everything unfold. it's funny; the four friends are very good at playing their characters - to the point where you really get the feeling that they're just playing themselves. and last night, all of their characters really went through something - and outside of kevin dillon, they crapped the bed. it was a little too much to feel sad or anxious or confused. it's still a great show, one of the top five on tv. it was just disappointing last night.
frusion is fruit + fusion. when i think of something being fused together, i think of a welding mask and sparks. plus, since two things need to be fused together, and one of them is fruit, then i ask you, "praytell, what is the other?" that's too many doubts for me. i ain't drinking that thing.
at the a's-yankees game tonight, my roommate and i watched as a man went up to the condiment bar and proceeded to refill his ketchup bottle that he brought with him. of course, this brought about a two inning discussion, where we decided that the act in itself wasn't just cheap, but also psychotic. i mean, he saved 75 cents by doing that. the best part is the conversation he had before he went to the park - "honey, i'm going to the game tonight." "have a nice time, dear. hey, while you're there, can you fill up this ketchup bottle with some of that free stuff?" yep, this is surely a woman's idea. call me a chauvinist, but a man would never do that or even think of doing that under his own volition.
i actually agree with what kanye west said within a majority, but i think his timing is completely distasteful. he has every right to his opinion, but there's a time and a place, and a telethon to help the hurricane victims isn't it. that being said, his new album "late registration" is completely amazing, a mesmerizing display of his incredible talents as a songwriter, producer and lyricist. it's completely original in every way - every single way. and that makes it not just a great rap album; it's a great album period. check it out.
and i really didn't like the season-ending episode of "entourage" at all. everything was forced, really forced in - and this is coming from a series that was so masterful at being so effable that it was so comforting just to sit back and watch everything unfold. it's funny; the four friends are very good at playing their characters - to the point where you really get the feeling that they're just playing themselves. and last night, all of their characters really went through something - and outside of kevin dillon, they crapped the bed. it was a little too much to feel sad or anxious or confused. it's still a great show, one of the top five on tv. it was just disappointing last night.
Saturday, September 03, 2005
how we need pearl jam to keep fighting the good fight
here's the price breakdown of the two tickets i bought for the a's-yankees game through ticketmaster:
2 tickets @ $10.00 apiece. upper level. good seats.
the convenience fee is $3.75 per ticket, which, judging by the word "convenience", means i'm getting charged for the priviledge of not talking to a ticket vendor. or, even more simply, i'm getting charged a total of $7.50 for the convenience of me (not anyone else, but me) typing "ticketmaster.com" in my browser.
kinda makes you want to redefine "convenience".
on top of that, there's a $6.25 fee for them to redirect me from there to another website where i can print my tickets online.
why $6.25 instead of nothing? well, i'm assuming that's the price of a toll i have to pass through while travelling on the information superhighway.
so it cost me $33.25 to get $20 worth of tickets.
ticketmaster, be gentle with my ass.
2 tickets @ $10.00 apiece. upper level. good seats.
the convenience fee is $3.75 per ticket, which, judging by the word "convenience", means i'm getting charged for the priviledge of not talking to a ticket vendor. or, even more simply, i'm getting charged a total of $7.50 for the convenience of me (not anyone else, but me) typing "ticketmaster.com" in my browser.
kinda makes you want to redefine "convenience".
on top of that, there's a $6.25 fee for them to redirect me from there to another website where i can print my tickets online.
why $6.25 instead of nothing? well, i'm assuming that's the price of a toll i have to pass through while travelling on the information superhighway.
so it cost me $33.25 to get $20 worth of tickets.
ticketmaster, be gentle with my ass.
how anything is see-through
this is a quote from uconn basketball jim calhoun, talking about his two point guards who were arrested stealing laptops on campus. keep in mind that his original tone was they should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
“I want to be able to have the opportunity to discipline them and to bring them back and get them on track so they can understand fully that they are responsible for their actions, etc. I feel I can do this if the university grants me that right and the court system grants me that right.
“The court system, based upon precedent, will probably give me that opportunity and now I'm going to ask — to beg — the university to grant me the opportunity to discipline them and bring them back.”
translation: since my first statements, my team has since returned to campus, and while watching them scrimmage, i realized that i desperately need my point guards to run my offense. if it were one of them gone, fine. but it's both of them. i'm stuck. i need them back. please. i'll make them run extra laps. a lot of extra laps. they can even sit out a game against, i don't know, central connecticut state. anything. but i need them back. please.
pretty please.
“I want to be able to have the opportunity to discipline them and to bring them back and get them on track so they can understand fully that they are responsible for their actions, etc. I feel I can do this if the university grants me that right and the court system grants me that right.
“The court system, based upon precedent, will probably give me that opportunity and now I'm going to ask — to beg — the university to grant me the opportunity to discipline them and bring them back.”
translation: since my first statements, my team has since returned to campus, and while watching them scrimmage, i realized that i desperately need my point guards to run my offense. if it were one of them gone, fine. but it's both of them. i'm stuck. i need them back. please. i'll make them run extra laps. a lot of extra laps. they can even sit out a game against, i don't know, central connecticut state. anything. but i need them back. please.
pretty please.
how there's no lack of villains
i can't believe the shit that comes out of the mouths of people who should actually think before talking.
get this amazing piece of ignorant babbling from michael brown, the director of the federal emergency management agency (fema) about the people trapped in new orleans.
"I don't make judgments about why people chose not to leave but, you know, there was a mandatory evacuation of New Orleans...So, we've got to figure out some way to convince people that whenever warnings go out it's for their own good," Brown said. "Now, I don't want to second guess why they did that. My job now is to get relief to them."
what an asshole. they had no way out, jerkoff! not everyone has a sport utility vehicle like you do (and i'm assuming he does). not everyone lives in luxury or even with the basic amenities that dickheads like you take for granted.
i can't believe this shit. surely our president will tear him a new one.
oh wait, i forgot that g-dub is our leader, the same guy who responded to cindy sheehan's plea to talk to her about her dead son with "it's also important for me to go on with my life". the same guy who gave the nation's highest civilian honor to former cia director george tenet who, as the story now goes, supplied the president with false information about iraq that lead to the war we're in.
i could go on.
at least, the children in congress can agree on something obvious about the prez. from cnn.com
"He heard some things he didn't want to believe at first," said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana. "The president is starting to grasp the magnitude of the situation."
Four days after Katrina killed hundreds if not thousands, Republicans joined Democrats in shaking their heads.
"If we can't respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we're prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?" asked former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican.
Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts called the government's response "an embarrassment."
great job, america. how safe do you feel now?
get this amazing piece of ignorant babbling from michael brown, the director of the federal emergency management agency (fema) about the people trapped in new orleans.
"I don't make judgments about why people chose not to leave but, you know, there was a mandatory evacuation of New Orleans...So, we've got to figure out some way to convince people that whenever warnings go out it's for their own good," Brown said. "Now, I don't want to second guess why they did that. My job now is to get relief to them."
what an asshole. they had no way out, jerkoff! not everyone has a sport utility vehicle like you do (and i'm assuming he does). not everyone lives in luxury or even with the basic amenities that dickheads like you take for granted.
i can't believe this shit. surely our president will tear him a new one.
oh wait, i forgot that g-dub is our leader, the same guy who responded to cindy sheehan's plea to talk to her about her dead son with "it's also important for me to go on with my life". the same guy who gave the nation's highest civilian honor to former cia director george tenet who, as the story now goes, supplied the president with false information about iraq that lead to the war we're in.
i could go on.
at least, the children in congress can agree on something obvious about the prez. from cnn.com
"He heard some things he didn't want to believe at first," said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana. "The president is starting to grasp the magnitude of the situation."
Four days after Katrina killed hundreds if not thousands, Republicans joined Democrats in shaking their heads.
"If we can't respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we're prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?" asked former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican.
Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts called the government's response "an embarrassment."
great job, america. how safe do you feel now?
Friday, September 02, 2005
how he will take advantage of this
there are many terrible things about hurricane katrina, but an under-the-radar one is how bush and his administration are gonna spin this disaster into their political favor, much like how they use 9/11 as a crutch for every incompetent decision they make.
seriously, this hurricane was the best thing bush could ask for. suddenly iraq is barely mentioned or televised. at his worst possible moment, new orleans is wiped out and, for the time being, so is iraq.
and you just know the name "katrina" is gonna be the most repeated thing off his lips once the next tragedy in iraq occurs. divert! dvert! divert!
you just know it.
seriously, this hurricane was the best thing bush could ask for. suddenly iraq is barely mentioned or televised. at his worst possible moment, new orleans is wiped out and, for the time being, so is iraq.
and you just know the name "katrina" is gonna be the most repeated thing off his lips once the next tragedy in iraq occurs. divert! dvert! divert!
you just know it.
Thursday, September 01, 2005
how there should be a coronation
my roommate jr always foolishly asks me who made bruce springsteen the boss.
don't laugh at him. he's just in the dark about all things bruce.
but, considering that shakespeare wrote about kings and those same kings are now immortalized through his works and classes, it concludes to me that the same should be done of bosses.
and i ask, how many bosses have had that happen about them?
yep, just one.
don't laugh at him. he's just in the dark about all things bruce.
but, considering that shakespeare wrote about kings and those same kings are now immortalized through his works and classes, it concludes to me that the same should be done of bosses.
and i ask, how many bosses have had that happen about them?
yep, just one.
how it starts somewhere
consider this a kick start.
here's a list of charities to to help those poor people in the bayou.
red cross
feed the children
the salvation army
the united way
here's a list of charities to to help those poor people in the bayou.
red cross
feed the children
the salvation army
the united way
how pomposity can get in the way of generosity
stuff like this really gets under my skin :
serena williams announced that, with every ace she serves, she will donate $100 to the hurricane relief fund.
i think she's doing a nice thing. don't get me wrong. but why does it have to be a bet? she's got more money than god. why not just pick a nice sizeable number to donate and then double it? why does her much needed donation depend on whether her opponents can return serve? that's so completely egocentric.
seriously, just donate a chunk of money and play your damn game.
and it's not just her. we'll be hearing all about this type of stuff for katrina aid or for anything else that goes on.
in fact, there's something called "strike out cancer", in which for every strikeout thrown by a giants pitcher at home, a company named genetech will make a $200 donation. how about just making one very large friggin donation? the giants have one strikeout pitcher in their rotation, and their fireballing reliever has been hurt all year. why does cancer research have to be punished because the giants have had soft throwers like kirk reuter in their rotation? hey, as long as it gets the company's name in the paper and there's a nice logo on the right field wall, who cares?
enough with the games already. just donate.
serena williams announced that, with every ace she serves, she will donate $100 to the hurricane relief fund.
i think she's doing a nice thing. don't get me wrong. but why does it have to be a bet? she's got more money than god. why not just pick a nice sizeable number to donate and then double it? why does her much needed donation depend on whether her opponents can return serve? that's so completely egocentric.
seriously, just donate a chunk of money and play your damn game.
and it's not just her. we'll be hearing all about this type of stuff for katrina aid or for anything else that goes on.
in fact, there's something called "strike out cancer", in which for every strikeout thrown by a giants pitcher at home, a company named genetech will make a $200 donation. how about just making one very large friggin donation? the giants have one strikeout pitcher in their rotation, and their fireballing reliever has been hurt all year. why does cancer research have to be punished because the giants have had soft throwers like kirk reuter in their rotation? hey, as long as it gets the company's name in the paper and there's a nice logo on the right field wall, who cares?
enough with the games already. just donate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)